Top markets for affordable renovated housing inventory

Despite the rapidly deteriorating affordability, there is some hope for homebuyers in the form of renovated homes: properties that have been rehabbed into move-in ready condition after being purchased at auction.

HousingWire Magazine: December 2021/ January 2022

AS WE ENTER A NEW YEAR, let’s look at some of the events that we can look forward to in 2022. But what about what’s next for the housing industry?

Mortgage Tech Virtual Demo Day

Tune in to our live Virtual Demo Day on December 1st at 10am CT to experience demos from the most innovative tech companies in the Servicing, Audit and Post-Close space.

Logan Mohtashami on Omicron and pending home sales

In this episode of HousingWire Daily, Logan Mohtashami discusses how the new COVID variant, Omicron, will impact inflation and whether or not it will send mortgage rates lower.

AgentReal EstateBrokerageFintech

DOJ probes NAR pocket listings ban

But the National Association Realtors stated Monday that they will resist a demand from information by the Biden administration, which they say illegally ended a consent decree


A communique that National Association of Realtors fired off Monday gives clues on what the Biden administration’s probe into the real estate trade group looks like – with one area of investigation NAR’s ban on pocket listings.

The U.S. Justice Department’s antitrust division announced on July 1 that they unilaterally withdrew from a consent decree Trump administration lawyers hammered out with NAR last November.

The Chicago-based NAR, which represents agents, brokerages, and consumers, declared then that they were “blindsided” by DOJ backing out, and has since assailed the Biden administration for breaking what they say is a legally binding contract.

On Monday, NAR sent to reporters a 44-page legal briefing stating that they want to set aside or modify a civil investigative demand made by the Justice Department. A civil investigative demand is a tool used by federal government agencies to gather information, usually prior to the filing of any legal action.

A copy of the civil investigative demand was not provided by either NAR or DOJ upon request. But NAR’s petition indicates that DOJ wants information regarding the trade group’s, “Participation Rule and Clear Cooperation Policy.”

NAR’s Participation Rule regards the guidelines brokers must follow to participate in a Multiple Listings Service, the majority of which are owned and operated by local NAR chapters.

According to NAR’s petition, DOJ wants a record of all documents relating to any broker withdrawal from an MLS within the last 15 years, and to catalogue any potential broker withdrawals.

NAR slammed the request as “untenable” because there are “hundreds of Realtor-associations owned multiple listings services across spread throughout the country,” and, “Some have tens of thousands of members.”

Clear Cooperation Policy, meanwhile, is what is better known as the prohibition on pocket listings. Agents who are members of an MLS under NAR’s umbrella must post a home listing to that MLS within one business day after marketing it.

DOJ has already intervened in federal appeals court on behalf of luxury listings service The, which sued NAR over the ban.

NAR’s petition does not elaborate on what information DOJ may want regarding the pocket listings guideline, but argues that, according to the consent decree, the Justice Department had agreed to drop the matter.

Much of the petition concerns not what the civil investigative demand wants but instead NAR’s argument that any demand is illegitimate because DOJ had no right to exit the consent agreement.

DOJ has set a “Potentially catastrophic precedent that would undermine the strong public policy in favor of settlements and public confidence the federal government will keep its word,” the petition reads.

The petition also takes DOJ to task for not giving NAR enough time to respond before announcing settlement withdrawal. A trade group that arguably shapes the terms of engagement for the millions of agents, brokerage personnel, and consumers who participate in the residential real estate economy expressed displeasure with DOJ’s communications approach.  

“On April 15, 2021, Antitrust Division of Staff contacted NAR’s counsel to schedule a time to discuss the proposed Consent Judgment,” the petition reads. “This started a series of conversations that continued at the pace dictated by the Antitrust Division.”

On June 30, DOJ issued an “ultimatum” that asked NAR to respond within one day to DOJ’s proposed revamping of the consent decree, according to the petition. NAR responded to the DOJ that it couldn’t meet the deadline. And that it could not say when a response might be filed, telling DOJ, “We are a membership organization that must involve several people in significant decisions.”

DOJ declined to comment for this article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular Articles

FHFA: Government to back mortgages up to $970,800 in 2022

The FHFA today announced the baseline conforming loan limit for 2022 will be $647,200, an increase of 18%. In high-cost areas, the new ceiling loan limit is $970,800.

Nov 30, 2021 By
3d rendering of a row of luxury townhouses along a street

Log In

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account? Please