Suppose we agree that we would like our society to have widespread home ownership and a property-owning citizenry. Does it take government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with implied taxpayer guarantees, tax advantages for the interest paid on home mortgages, and government pressure for “creative” mortgage lending to achieve this? The Canadian experience shows that it doesn’t. Canada makes a useful comparison for the U.S. Both countries are rich, advanced, stable, have sophisticated financial systems and pioneer histories, and stretch from Atlantic to Pacific. But Canada has no housing GSEs. Mortgage interest is not tax deductible.
Why Canada avoided a mortgage meltdown
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Spring housing market gets more inventory
We’ve now had back-to-back weeks of healthy housing inventory growth, making spring 2024 much healthier than spring 2023.
-
The best real estate podcasts for agents and brokers in 2024
-
Home sellers saw their profits shrink in the first quarter: Attom
-
If reelected, Trump could seek greater control over Federal Reserve
-
Acra CEO Keith Lind on staying the course amid choppy waters in non-QM
-
HUD walks back some proposed changes to HECM for Purchase program