[Update 1: Adds confirmation from Granger’s office] The Social Security Administration (SSA) plans to raise its fees for verifying mortgage borrowers’ identities, a move that is facing Congressional opposition. The fee for mortgage and financial institutions to authenticate borrower Social Security numbers is set to increase from $0.56 to $5.00 per verification on October 1. But Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas) is said to be leading a Congressional challenge to the increase, according to a statement from Rapid Reporting, a Fort Worth, Texas-based national provider of third-party income, identity and employment verification services. In a letter to SSA commissioner Michael Astrue, Granger said the fee increase has the potential to discourage lenders from using the administration’s Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS), opening the door for mortgage fraud abuse. Granger is said to have called for a 60-day delay of the increase to give the matter further study, a request Astrue denied, but a meeting is scheduled for Tuesday between Granger and representatives from the SSA to discuss the implications of the fee increase. A spokesperson from Granger’s office confirmed the letter was sent to Astrue and Tuesday’s staff-level meeting. “With lower loan production and lenders’ increased focus on cutting costs, this fee increase could have a highly detrimental impact on the mortgage industry, as well as the US and global economies,” said Jay Meadows, CEO of Rapid Reporting. “While unfortunate, it’s a definite possibility that lenders will avoid using these higher priced CVSB-based Social Security number authentication, even though it’s a reliable way to protect against identity fraud.” As HousingWire reported last week, the FBI is cracking down on mortgage fraud, and other federal and state agencies are also stepping up enforcement. Meadows added increasing the cost for lenders to screen for fraud would hamper industry efforts to recovery from the housing downturn and make efforts to curb fraud less effective. If the fee increase goes through as scheduled, Meadows said the higher rate is still less than the losses incurred from a fraudulent loan. “Lenders need to remain diligent in their efforts to combat fraud,” Meadows said. “With buy-backs costing companies hundreds of thousands of dollars per incident, even adding a few extra dollars per applicant still brings about a strong return on investment.” Write to Austin Kilgore.
Social Security Plan to Raise Verification Rate Meets Opposition
September 21, 2009, 10:54am
Most Popular Articles
The hidden cost of leverage: Why today’s real estate investors need to be more conservative than ever
In today’s high-cost market, excessive leverage can quickly turn a profitable property into a financial liability. Investors must prioritize conservative underwriting and consistent cash flow over extracting maximum equity.
Jun 30, 2026
-
Introducing the 2026 Women of Influence
Jul 01, 2026 -
GSEs release historical FICO 10T data, expand VantageScore 4.0 file
Jul 01, 2026 -
Berkshire’s Clayton adds McGuinn Homes to Mungo as scale race widens
Jul 01, 2026 -
Compass International Holdings rolls out Home Platform across brokerage brands
Jul 02, 2026 -
Two Harbors investors approve deal with CCM at $12 per share
Jul 02, 2026
Latest Articles
Third time’s the charm: Arizona’s new special district opportunity
Arizona House Bill 2999 creates State Affordability Infrastructure Districts formed through the Arizona Finance Authority, reducing local approval risk. The law allows tax exempt GO, special assessment and revenue bonds and can fund broad public infrastructure, including certain impact fees.
-
Turning insight to action for real estate pros
-
Better mortgage spreads are still keeping home sales positive
-
Reffkin takes the stand, MRED CEO says Zillow threatened litigation over listing policy dispute
-
Government-backed modular housing trend arrives in Cleveland
-
Will the ROAD Act change what pencils for multifamily rentals?