PGA golfer Dustin Johnson sues Nat Hardwick for $3 million theft

PGA golfer Dustin Johnson sues Nat Hardwick for $3 million theft

Former LandCastle Title CEO was Johnson's attorney and "trusted advisor"

Are record-low interest rates masking high-cost mortgage lending?

Five leading economists weigh in and the answer may surprise you

Auction.com partners with Google to predict housing trends

Nowcast will predict in real time
W S
Servicing / The Ticker

Foreclosures will continue under market's current design

/ Print / Reprints /
| Share More
/ Text Size+

Somehow it all comes back around to what's happening at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a Boston Globe writer contends. In a new opinion piece, a Globe editorial writer suggests that without principal reductions at the agencies, the banks recent push to allow principal reductions is not enough to create a full housing rebound.

Here's a bit more from the piece:

Principal write-downs work, but Fannie and Freddie have dodged them because they’re politically poisonous. So even as one branch of the government has forced the country’s biggest banks to use principal reduction as a tool for keeping homeowners out of foreclosure, the two mortgage companies that taxpayers own, Fannie and Freddie, won’t join in. The companies would rather foreclose than write down principal for troubled borrowers. They’re refusing to sell foreclosed homes to nonprofits that sell foreclosed homes back to their former owners — a post-foreclosure tool for reducing principal — even in the face of a Massachusetts law banning such restrictions.

Read full story

Recent Articles by HousingWire Staff

Comments powered by Disqus