FHFA leaving g-fees alone, revising primary mortgage insurance requirements

FHFA leaving g-fees alone, revising primary mortgage insurance requirements

Move will lower fees for riskier borrowers; change is ‘revenue neutral’

Housing advocacy groups call on FHFA, CFPB to investigate “pro-foreclosure” tactics

Groups cite Ocwen as leader in preventing mortgage defaults

Court filing reveals name of anonymous whistleblower in Zillow/Move lawsuit

Former Zillow VP of Strategic Partnerships wrote the letter
W S
Servicing / The Ticker

Foreclosures will continue under market's current design

/ Print / Reprints /
| Share More
/ Text Size+

Somehow it all comes back around to what's happening at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a Boston Globe writer contends. In a new opinion piece, a Globe editorial writer suggests that without principal reductions at the agencies, the banks recent push to allow principal reductions is not enough to create a full housing rebound.

Here's a bit more from the piece:

Principal write-downs work, but Fannie and Freddie have dodged them because they’re politically poisonous. So even as one branch of the government has forced the country’s biggest banks to use principal reduction as a tool for keeping homeowners out of foreclosure, the two mortgage companies that taxpayers own, Fannie and Freddie, won’t join in. The companies would rather foreclose than write down principal for troubled borrowers. They’re refusing to sell foreclosed homes to nonprofits that sell foreclosed homes back to their former owners — a post-foreclosure tool for reducing principal — even in the face of a Massachusetts law banning such restrictions.

Read full story

Recent Articles by HousingWire Staff

Comments powered by Disqus