It’s hard to say what’s more exasperating: the woeful performance of the credit ratings agencies during the recent mortgage securities boom or the failure to hold them accountable in the bust that followed. Not that Congress hasn’t tried, mind you. The Dodd-Frank financial reform law, enacted last year, imposed the same legal liabilities on Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and other credit raters that have long applied to legal and accounting firms that attest to statements made in securities prospectuses. Investors cheered the legislation, which subjected the ratings agencies to what is known as expert liability under the securities laws. But since Dodd-Frank passed, Congress’s noble attempt to protect investors from misconduct by ratings agencies has been thwarted by, of all things, the Securities & Exchange Commission. The S.E.C., which calls itself “the investor’s advocate,” is quietly allowing the raters to escape this accountability.
Jason Philyaw was a reporter with HousingWire through mid-2012.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Continued Iran conflict raises mortgage rate risk into late 2026
If the Iran conflict lasts five to six more months, the peak mortgage rate could run 0.375% to 0.435% above 6.75% despite better spreads.
-
Housing demand stays positive with mortgage rates near 2026 highs
-
Boston’s international business boom equals more demand for housing
-
Trump says Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac IPO still on the table
-
Akron looks to deflate minimum lot size rules to spur infill
-
Mortgage Forward to acquire First Federal Bank’s TPO division
Jason Philyaw was a reporter with HousingWire through mid-2012.see full bio