Citigroup Inc. (C) with the U.S. Treasury Department on Friday announced it would exchange common stock for the preferred securities obtained by the Treasury through the Capital Purchase Program (CPP), effectively increasing the government’s share of the company to 36 percent. The transaction was designed to increase Citi’s tangible common equity and restore investor confidence “without any additional U.S. government investment,” the bank said. The offer to exchange common stock for preferred securities will also apply to other preferred holders, up to $27.5 billion of Citi’s existing preferred securities, at a conversion price of $3.25 per share. The Treasury said it had agreed to convert its security to match the private preferred exchanges dollar-for-dollar, to convert up to the $25 billion of preferred stock issued under the CPP, and that it would “receive the most favorable terms and price offered to any other preferred holder through this exchange.” The Treasury also said any remaining preferred issued under the Targeted Investment Program and Asset Guarantee Program would be converted into a trust preferred security “of greater structural seniority” with the same 8 percent cash dividend rate inherent in the existing issue. Citi first in October received $25 billion through the CPP; then in December it received another $20 billion through the TIP. In mid-January, the Treasury pledged up to $5 billion as its portion of the government AGP. Despite the handful of lifelines tossed to Citi, the bank announced in mid-January it would reorganize into two businesses after suffering $18.7 billion in fourth-quarter losses. It seems not enough could be done to prop up investor confidence in the bank, which also announced Friday it would begin a major overhaul on its board of directors, building a majority of “new independent directors as soon as feasible.” Citi stocks were down as much as 37 percent in early trading Friday after the announcement shook investors and rekindled doubt in the U.S. banking system outside of nationalization — or at least partial government ownership. Write to Diana Golobay at [email protected]. Disclosure: The author held no relevant investment positions when this story was published. Indirect holdings may exist via mutual fund investments. HW reporters and writers follow a strict disclosure policy, the first in the mortgage trade.
Diana Golobay was a reporter with HousingWire through mid-2010, providing wide-ranging coverage of the U.S. financial crisis. She has since moved onto other roles as a writer and editor.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
We are not ready for the next housing downturn
Pandemic-era forbearance and modifications relied on servicer liquidity supported by a refi boom and lower rates. If a downturn arrives amid inflation, policymakers may need new liquidity backstops to prevent servicer failures and borrower harm.
Jul 21, 2026
-
Michigan’s Whitmer steps up, signs single-stair reform into law
Jul 22, 2026 -
Mortgage rates hit yearly high as Iran conflict escalates
Jul 23, 2026 -
‘Tale of two’ Miami housing markets reflects changing priorities, international demand
Jul 23, 2026 -
Berkshire completes Taylor Morrison deal valued at $8.5B enterprise value
Jul 24, 2026 -
Why homebuilders aren’t building more homes
Jul 24, 2026
Latest Articles
Home sales are positive but higher rates slowing demand
Spreads were 1.94%, keeping rates below 7%, while purchase apps were up 0.2% yearly and pending sales held near flat.
-
Coldwell Banker Warburg folds into Compass in New York
-
Don’t fall for a fake foreclosure crisis
-
Deed theft remains a growing threat for seniors, Black homeowners
-
Berkshire completes Taylor Morrison deal valued at $8.5B enterprise value
-
NVR is land light by design, Q2 2026 reveals the strategy has limits
Diana Golobay was a reporter with HousingWire through mid-2010, providing wide-ranging coverage of the U.S. financial crisis. She has since moved onto other roles as a writer and editor.see full bio