There is an emerging consensus among financial experts and policy makers that the key to successful modifications is to reduce the amount of the borrower’s loan balance, rather than merely reducing the monthly payment. The goal is to lower the payment while restoring equity, thus giving borrowers both the means and the incentive to keep up with their payments. Administration officials have resisted that approach, in part because they believe it would be too expensive. Another obstacle is the lenders themselves. In general, a lender is unwilling to take losses by reducing principal unless the owners of the second mortgage on a home also take a hit. For banks that own the second mortgages, such losses would be huge — something they clearly would prefer not to face up to.
Editorial: The Year in Foreclosures
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Reverse mortgages seen as a path forward for lenders
Leaders at Guild Mortgage and Guaranteed Rate explained some of their approaches to the reverse mortgage business during The Gathering.
-
Blend receives $150M infusion from Haveli Investments
-
Michigan attorney general reissues reverse mortgage consumer alert
-
eXp Realty makes changes to its executive team
-
Housing affordability dipped in March: First American
-
Title insurance executives are confident the Biden proposals won’t come to much