There is an emerging consensus among financial experts and policy makers that the key to successful modifications is to reduce the amount of the borrower’s loan balance, rather than merely reducing the monthly payment. The goal is to lower the payment while restoring equity, thus giving borrowers both the means and the incentive to keep up with their payments. Administration officials have resisted that approach, in part because they believe it would be too expensive. Another obstacle is the lenders themselves. In general, a lender is unwilling to take losses by reducing principal unless the owners of the second mortgage on a home also take a hit. For banks that own the second mortgages, such losses would be huge — something they clearly would prefer not to face up to.
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
MBA analysis finds minimal pricing impact from single credit score approach
MBA reviewed nearly 105,000 applications from 2025 and found 90% of random scores were within one LLPA bucket of decisioning.
Jul 10, 2026
-
Foreclosures climb 21% in first half of 2026, pushed by higher stress in FHA, VA mortgages
Jul 16, 2026 -
Can the housing market weather Iran conflict 2.0 and higher rates?
Jul 18, 2026 -
The housing market not normalizing, as affordability failure persists
Jul 20, 2026 -
Mortgage volumes point to bank share gains in Q2
Jul 20, 2026 -
NEXA Lending and former partner Mat Grella end legal fight
Jul 20, 2026
Latest Articles
Mortgage applications rise 1.9% despite elevated rates
MBA data show mortgage applications rose 1.9% as the 30-year conforming rate increased to 6.69% and purchases rose 6% week over week.
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio