Via Paul Krugman at the New York Times, a visual that shows real income history for the 35-44 crowd:
But you’ll be glad to know that those over 65 have seen a huge jump in their income under the current administration, in contrast. For many, the housing rush was one of the only ways the younger crowd (read: still working) could better their financial fortunes during the past 5 or so years, even if they were busy leveraging themselves to untenable levels to make it happen. With housing now a complete bust, and the correction cycle in its infant stages, the ugly truth on real income is much more hard to ignore. I’ve said that housing and mortgages will be central to the upcoming election, and this is why.
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Trump says Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac IPO still on the table
Trump said an IPO for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is still being considered, even as FHFA Director Bill Pulte becomes acting DNI June 30.
-
Akron looks to deflate minimum lot size rules to spur infill
-
Mortgage Forward to acquire First Federal Bank’s TPO division
-
Nest Egg Protection Act would raise capital gains tax exclusion for senior home sellers
-
Drees Homes bets on operational leadership for next century
-
Synergy One to merge with APM; Steve Majerus named president
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio