Discussion among market players and even Federal Reserve officials on when the Fed may begin to exit asset-purchasing programs are “very premature,” according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York president and CEO William Dudley. In a speech Saturday before the Association for a Better New York, Dudley said agency debt- and mortgage-backed-securities-purchase programs as well as the Treasury-purchase program contributed overall to the Fed’s expanded balance sheet. But the swelling balance sheet does not pose inevitable threats of inflation and do not necessitate talks of immediately winding-down the Fed’s agency MBS-purchase program. Dudley said in the case of lackluster recovery, unemployment and capacity remain too high to foster inflation, regardless of the Fed’s balance sheet. “[C]oncern about ‘when’ the Fed will exit from its current accommodative monetary policy stance is, in my view, very premature,” he said. He did, however, acknowledge the importance of looking at just how the Fed can exit its numerous monetary policies. The size of purchase programs looks likely to push the Fed’s balance sheet to roughly $2.5trn, above the peak reached last December, Dudley said. His comments that talks regarding when the Fed may exit are premature came days after two prominent Fed officials spoke about possible exits. In a speech late last week, St. Louis Federal Reserve president James Bullard indicated the Fed would in 2010 begin the shift into implementing an exit strategy by eliminating the liquidity programs as they expire, exiting the current interest rate policy and ceasing the asset-purchase program. He said recent housing data indicates the market is near bottom. “While exiting liquidity programs seems quite clear, exiting the asset purchase program may have to rely on selling assets as appropriate,” he said. The same day Bullard gave his speech, the Richmond Federal Reserve president Jeffrey Lacker said purchasing agency MBS to the extent of the $1.25trn allowed under the program may provide more stimulus than needed or even helpful. “With the economy leveling out and beginning to grow again later this year, and with bank reserve demand ebbing as financial conditions improve, I will be evaluating carefully whether we need or want the additional stimulus that purchasing the full amount authorized under our agency mortgage-backed securities purchase program would provide,” Lacker said. Write to Diana Golobay.
Diana Golobay was a reporter with HousingWire through mid-2010, providing wide-ranging coverage of the U.S. financial crisis. She has since moved onto other roles as a writer and editor.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Foreclosures climb 21% in first half of 2026, pushed by higher stress in FHA, VA mortgages
U.S. foreclosure activity rose again in the first half of 2026, with 227,548 properties receiving filings, up 21% from the same period in 2025, according to ATTOM’s midyear foreclosure report.
Jul 16, 2026
-
Michigan’s Whitmer steps up, signs single-stair reform into law
Jul 22, 2026 -
Manhattan project contractor error eyed in conversion collapse
Jul 21, 2026 -
Senior housing wealth reaches record level in first quarter
Jul 21, 2026 -
We are not ready for the next housing downturn
Jul 21, 2026 -
Will Trump’s new Canadian tariffs add cost risk for builders?
Jul 21, 2026
Latest Articles
Coldwell Banker Warburg folds into Compass in New York
Coldwell Banker Warburg will operate as Warburg at Compass in New York, and Compass has not set a timeline for the transition.
-
Don’t fall for a fake foreclosure crisis
-
Deed theft remains a growing threat for seniors, Black homeowners
-
Berkshire completes Taylor Morrison deal valued at $8.5B enterprise value
-
NVR is land light by design, Q2 2026 reveals the strategy has limits
-
Equity Union expands into Nevada with first market outside California
Diana Golobay was a reporter with HousingWire through mid-2010, providing wide-ranging coverage of the U.S. financial crisis. She has since moved onto other roles as a writer and editor.see full bio