Headlines on Wednesday will note that mortgage applications tanked last week, citing data released by the Mortgage Bankers Association, which show that composite applications (purchase and refinance transactions) fell by a whopping 10.6 percent. The MBA’s composite index registered 591.4 for the week ended Sept. 19, down sharply from 661.7 one week earlier. The application index is calibrated to March 16, 1990; a reading of 591.4 means that application activity was roughly 6.6 times greater than when the index was first established. Refinancing and purchase activity suffered last week as mortgage rates soared during one of the most tumultuous weeks in U.S. financial market history; refinancing application volume fell 11.2 percent, the MBA said, while purchase application activity dropped 10 percent from one week earlier. Even FHA loan applications, one of the few strengths in the current mortgage market, tumbled by 8.9 percent. Conflicting data Yet, as has been the case throughout this mess, different data sources end up showing wildly different conclusions; in this case, a separate application index maintained by Mortgage Maxx LLC — called the MAX — found that applications actually rose slightly during the week of Sept. 19, up 0.3 percent. The MAX index data has traditionally been used by prepayment researchers on Wall Street, as it corrects for multiple applications by one borrower — allowing for a more accurate read on forward demand for mortgages (borrowers may apply numerous times, but will end up with only one mortgage). It’s enough to leave analysts scratching their heads. After all, the two indices often vary in magnitude, but not in direction. Worse yet, it’s usually the case that the MBA index overstates demand: in good times, borrowers shop for the best mortgages, while in bad times, borrowers scramble to find a mortgage they can be approved for. All of which means that seeing the MAX data suggest a flat application trend on a week when the MBA data shows a sharp decline is enough to confound even the most experienced MBS analyst. “The only explanation I can think of is that borrowers gave up last week, or for some other reason decided to slow the multiple application train,” said one source, an analyst that spoke with HW on condition of anonymity. “Instead of applying everywhere and praying they got a mortgage, borrowers may have applied at one place and given up if they weren’t approved.” That’s just a guess, of course, but it underscores a much larger point about just how difficult prepayment modeling — a critical component for mortgage pricing — really is in the current environment. For more information, visit http://www.mortgagebankers.org or http://www.mortgagemaxx.us.
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Housing demand holds steady as regional inventory trends reshape the market
Regional inventory trends are reshaping the housing market even as buyer demand remains positive across every major U.S. region.
Jun 25, 2026
-
Mortgage performance steady in May as calendar drives delinquency bump
Jun 26, 2026 -
How the housing market survived the Iran conflict
Jun 27, 2026 -
Why Carlisle Companies targets Owens Corning for an M&A combo
Jun 30, 2026 -
Introducing the 2026 Women of Influence
Jul 01, 2026 -
GSEs release historical FICO 10T data, expand VantageScore 4.0 file
Jul 01, 2026
Latest Articles
Government-backed modular housing trend arrives in Cleveland
Cleveland tapped $2.56M in Ohio historic preservation tax credits to redevelop a 1901 building into an MMY modular housing factory.”,
-
Will the ROAD Act change what pencils for multifamily rentals?
-
First MLS names Jenni Bonura chief growth officer
-
RealTrends Verified The Craig Tann Group continues decade of growth
-
MISMO updates mortgage insurance data guide for VantageScore 4.0 and FICO 10T
-
America 250 is a turning point for American homeownership
Paul Jackson is the former publisher and CEO at HousingWire.see full bio