Reporting From Washington — If there is a term that strikes fear in the hearts of residential lenders everywhere, it is “cramdown.” Lenders dread the judicial procedure that erases a portion of a borrower’s mortgage because the house, which is the underlying security or collateral for the loan, is worth less than what is owed on it. Actually, the word is a euphemism for forcing a ruling upon a creditor, as in “crammed down” the lender’s throat. The proper term is “bifurcation,” meaning that in a bankruptcy proceeding the loan is split into a secured claim equal to the current appraised value of the property and an unsecured claim equal to the difference between the unpaid balance and the home’s present value. Generally, the borrower is required to continue to pay on the secured portion, while the difference is treated like any other unsecured debt.
Debate might give new life to mortgage cramdown legislation
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Labor market report is good news for mortgage rates
Friday’s jobs report came in as a miss of estimates and wage growth came in lower than expected, which is good news for mortgage rates.
-
Virginia Realtors: Zillow’s touring agreement may not be legal
-
Low inventory creates challenging conditions in North Carolina’s housing market
-
Tri-state area housing shortage could cost the region economically
-
Remote reverse mortgage counseling now permanently permitted in Massachusetts
-
NAR settlement terms slated to go into effect in mid-August