It’s hard to say what’s more exasperating: the woeful performance of the credit ratings agencies during the recent mortgage securities boom or the failure to hold them accountable in the bust that followed. Not that Congress hasn’t tried, mind you. The Dodd-Frank financial reform law, enacted last year, imposed the same legal liabilities on Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and other credit raters that have long applied to legal and accounting firms that attest to statements made in securities prospectuses. Investors cheered the legislation, which subjected the ratings agencies to what is known as expert liability under the securities laws. But since Dodd-Frank passed, Congress’s noble attempt to protect investors from misconduct by ratings agencies has been thwarted by, of all things, the Securities & Exchange Commission. The S.E.C., which calls itself “the investor’s advocate,” is quietly allowing the raters to escape this accountability.
Hey, SEC, that escape hatch is still open
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Acra CEO Keith Lind on staying the course amid choppy waters in non-QM
“It wasn’t pretty, I’m not gonna lie to you, but we got through it, and we ended up being profitable in 2022 and 2023.”
-
HUD walks back some proposed changes to HECM for Purchase program
-
Key housing markets are starting to buck national trends: Redfin
-
Median payment on purchase mortgage applications rises to $2,201: MBA
-
HUD, USDA reach accord on energy-efficiency standard for new construction
-
U.S. mortgage delinquency rates remain near historic lows: CoreLogic