Suppose we agree that we would like our society to have widespread home ownership and a property-owning citizenry. Does it take government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with implied taxpayer guarantees, tax advantages for the interest paid on home mortgages, and government pressure for “creative” mortgage lending to achieve this? The Canadian experience shows that it doesn’t. Canada makes a useful comparison for the U.S. Both countries are rich, advanced, stable, have sophisticated financial systems and pioneer histories, and stretch from Atlantic to Pacific. But Canada has no housing GSEs. Mortgage interest is not tax deductible.
Most Popular Articles
The hidden cost of leverage: Why today’s real estate investors need to be more conservative than ever
In today’s high-cost market, excessive leverage can quickly turn a profitable property into a financial liability. Investors must prioritize conservative underwriting and consistent cash flow over extracting maximum equity.
Jun 30, 2026
-
Why Carlisle Companies targets Owens Corning for an M&A combo
Jun 30, 2026 -
Introducing the 2026 Women of Influence
Jul 01, 2026 -
Why mortgage rates are rising, not falling, with oil under $70
Jul 01, 2026 -
GSEs release historical FICO 10T data, expand VantageScore 4.0 file
Jul 01, 2026 -
Berkshire’s Clayton adds McGuinn Homes to Mungo as scale race widens
Jul 01, 2026
Latest Articles
Better mortgage spreads are still keeping home sales positive
Mortgage spreads improved to 2.01%, keeping rates near 6.60% as total pending sales rose to 422,120 vs 396,652 last year.
-
Reffkin takes the stand, MRED CEO says Zillow threatened litigation over listing policy dispute
-
Government-backed modular housing trend arrives in Cleveland
-
Will the ROAD Act change what pencils for multifamily rentals?
-
First MLS names Jenni Bonura chief growth officer
-
RealTrends Verified The Craig Tann Group continues decade of growth