Never judge a house by its tax bill. That’s the lesson Don Newby, 65, is learning. The construction manager from Gibbsboro, N.J., is paying boom-era property taxes on a home that has lost 20 percent of its value in the past three years. He blames the Gibbsboro tax authorities, which haven’t reassessed property values in the town since 2003. “That’s absurd,” says Newby, who pays $14,000 a year in taxes on a four-bedroom, bi-level modern house in the New Jersey township that’s not far from Philadelphia. Newby, who was unemployed for a year following the economic collapse, claims the government is intentionally delaying new assessments to benefit from the lag as long as possible. “When you watch how property values have come down, it appears I could save almost $2,000 in taxes.”
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Banking, housing finance groups urge Basel III capital rule changes
A broad coalition of banking and housing finance trade groups is urging federal regulators to scale back parts of the proposed Basel III capital rules, arguing that overlapping requirements and elevated risk weights could unnecessarily restrict lending and economic growth.
-
California settlement forces MV Realty to void homeowner contracts
-
Exclusive: House Democrat reintroduces bill targeting mortgage credit access
-
8 best Florida real estate schools for 2026
-
How consumers are using AI and the impact on the role of the real estate agent
-
AI mortgage broker Ralo launches, raises $2.9M seed round