It will take greater accountability in financial transactions, specifically more stringent due diligence, for investors to be confident enough to buy mortgage-backed securities again. The stock and bond markets have rebounded strongly over the past year from the global financial meltdown of 2008. But recovery in the market for private residential mortgage-backed securities continues to be held up by continuing concerns about the underpinnings of these deals. The most frequently asked question we hear is: “What will it take for investors to start buying mortgage-backed securities again?” This question gains more urgency now that the federal government has withdrawn its presence that has largely kept the secondary market alive since the meltdown began in September 2008. The answer is that it will take greater accountability in financial transactions –- specifically, more stringent due diligence –- for investors to feel confident enough to buy these securities. No longer will a review of 10% or 20% of a securitized pool of mortgages be an acceptable representation of the whole pool. Rather, analysis of the entire pool will be expected, at least until investors feel comfortable with something less. This enhanced scrutiny will be demanded by the rating agencies, who have themselves been subjected to a vast amount of criticism the past two years for not performing their role in the quality assurance process. Standard & Poor’s, for example, has gone on record that it will not rate future mortgage deals unless due diligence is performed by an approved firm. Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service have developed their own criteria for the greater due diligence they will require going forward. A chief reason for the meltdown in the residential MBS market –- besides sheer greed — was the lack of accountability. Specifically, the industry failed to follow its longstanding “80-20 rule,” which holds that when the right 20% of a mortgage file is properly scrutinized — for property valuation, debt, and borrower income — 80% of the problems can be avoided. Centralized appraisal practices mandated by Fannie Mae are believed to be addressing the collateral valuation issue. Lenders have tightened borrower guidelines and are demanding more document disclosures. All of this will serve to re-open the flow of financing to borrowers, but improved due diligence also must be a key to long-term market revival. Alex Santos is president of Florida-based Digital Risk.
Improved Due Diligence is Key to Secondary Market Revival
May 21, 2010, 10:26am by Alex Santos
Most Popular Articles
Why housing demand is up and inventory is down in 2026
Pending sales rose to 75,856 vs 72,039 in 2025 as inventory turned negative year over year with mortgage rates near 6.58%.
Jun 13, 2026 By Logan Mohtashami
-
HUD tests a new Operation Breakthrough for today’s housing crisis
Jun 23, 2026By John McManus -
SERHANT. expands into Texas with 13 founding agents
Jun 23, 2026By HousingWire Automation -
Builders planned for undersupply, now demand is the swing factor
Jun 23, 2026By John McManus -
Trump abruptly delays signing of 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act
Jun 24, 2026By Sarah Wolak and Flávia Furlan Nunes -
Fannie Mae to expand title pilot program, Pulte says
Jun 24, 2026By Flávia Furlan Nunes
Latest Articles
BOK Financial’s Michael Merritt breaks down ROAD to Housing Act impact on homebuyers
Michael Merritt, BOK Financial’s senior vice president of customer care and default mortgage servicing, told HousingWire the bill represents a “good start, but not everything.”
-
Mamdani wins rent freeze for stabilized NYC apartments
-
Bill Gaul named data ambassador at GDX and IMLSF
-
Finding meaning in a busy world: The modern originator’s path to pursuit, purpose, passion and peace
-
In land acquisition, the fastest decision wins
-
KB Home Q2 2026 earnings point to scale vs execution debate