The Obama administration’s reform plan for the government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is drawing some praise and some criticism from the mortgage finance market — and some ho-hums as well. Among the concepts: A guarantee to investors against losses in mortgage-backed securities that the GSEs issue. “We are gratified to see that one of the concepts they articulate closely tracks MBA’s proposal, released 18 months ago, that visualizes a workable, commonsense system driven by private capital,” said Michael Berman, chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “Our proposal envisions an explicit, but limited, government guarantee of lower-risk mortgage-backed securities. The guarantee would be paid for by fees used to build a fund to protect taxpayers.” “We continue to believe that this is the most prudent approach, one that places the primary risk on private investors and ensures sufficient liquidity during times of economic stress in order to provide affordable mortgage finance in all types of mortgage market,” Berman said. The problem, critics say, is that there is little private-market residential mortgage-backed securities left after the Great Recession to fill any gap a GSE pull-back would leave. In its efforts to free Fannie and Freddie of its government lifeline, some say credit may be restricted further. Before the current economic turmoil, private-label RMBS made up more than 50% of mortgage financing for originations, representing a $1.3 trillion market, but it is now less than 5% of originations. “The GSEs are the only bid for secondary market in loans,” said a note from Institutional Risk Analytics advisory service. “Virtually all bank production today is being written for Fannie/Freddie/FHA guarantees. The guarantee fees are less than half the market rate, whatever that is. So talk about privatization is childish.” Jim Vogel of FTN Financial argues that the government will be looking to for ways to revamp its relationship with the GSEs before finding a new model altogether. “Fannie, Freddie and its regulator are charged with looking for every opportunity to reduce their footprint in the housing market with higher fees, smaller loan sizes, starting in the fall, and faster reductions in portfolio assets when it doesn’t disturb MBS prices,” he said in a note early Friday. “This will happen before there is a new plan to replace the GSEs.” Creating a new agency from scratch to ensure a fraction of mortgage securities is a horrifying idea, says economist Arnold Kling, former Freddie Mac economist and member of the Mercatus Center‘s Financial Markets Working Group. “It sounds like something that a graduate school class in public policy dreamed up, and shows the lack of business experience in the administration,” he said. “The best approach to GSE reform would be to phase out the GSEs over a period of three to five years, and to allow alternative channels of mortgage finance to evolve,” said Kling. “This GSE phase-out would help to avoid a resurgence of a financial system that became both overly concentrated and overly enmeshed in political cronyism.” Freddie Mac CEO Charles Haldeman Jr. disagreed wholeheartedly with Kling and said that the report should lead to commendation for the Obama administration and not condemnation. “Clearly they understand the key issues and the need for private sector capital to return to the housing market,” he said. “We at Freddie Mac will continue enhancing our infrastructure, business processes and technology to become the kind of stronger, more efficient company that can play a productive role no matter what policymakers decide about our future.” The government entity that oversees the GSEs, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said that the reform plan will get its full support. The GSEs control on the mortgage finance market must be broken, it said, and it is already working toward that goal. “We have already initiated programs to standardize mortgage data submissions and consider servicing compensation reforms.,” said FHFA acting director Edward J. DeMarco. “FHFA looks forward to working with the administration and Congress to restore the functioning of private markets and preserve the stability and liquidity of the secondary mortgage market,” he added. Write to Jacob Gaffney. Follow him on Twitter @JacobGaffney.
Most Popular Articles
The CFPB has been taking a long, hard look at some of its rules and regulations. Next up on its list to review is TRID, and it looks like eliminating the rule entirely is not off the table.
Of the three American generations following the Baby Boomers, the youngest is doing the best at managing its credit.