Beleaguered bond insurer MBIA Inc. (MBI) said Wednesday before market open that it lost $806.5 million, or $3.48 per share, during the third quarter, driven primarily by increases to loss reserves on the company’s second lien residential mortgage exposures. The quarterly loss compares to a $36.6 million net loss, or $.30/share, in the year ago period; the insurer had posted a profit of $1.7 billion one quarter earlier on an accounting quirk, as HW reported in August. MBIA reversed course — as we expected — on their curious Q2 decision not to add to loss reserves, saying it added $961 for its exposure to second liens during the third quarter; we’d singled out second liens as particularly problematic during the second quarter. MBIA said on Wednesday that it faces “high levels of loans that did not meet eligibility criteria for inclusion in the MBIA-insured transactions” as well as “improperly serviced loans,” and said it had taken legal action against two seller/servicers over repurchase claim disputes, while filing a repurchase claim with a third company. The near $1 billion loss reserve charge does not account for expected recoveries, the insurer said. One of the firms being sued by MBIA is Bank of America Corp. (BAC) unit Countrywide Financial; MBIA said in early October it has been forced to pay out more than $450 million on $14 billion in guarantees it provided for Countrywide mortgage bonds, alleging the lender fraudulently misrepresented its loan underwriting standards. MBIA said in Wednesday’s earnings announcement that its own internal audits have found that as much as 89 percent of delinquencies and defaults affecting deals it insured involved some breach of rep and warranties, implying it will litigate any further claims on RMBS and CDO deals it wrapped a guarantee on — which is either an indication of how much fraud really existed in recent vintages, or of MBIA’s desire for self-preservation. Take your pick. Paid claims continued to skyrocket at the bond insurer, reaching $491.3 million in the third quarter; paid claims were at $304.8 million one quarter ago, and just $107.5 million in the first quarter of this year. Despite the rising losses, MBIA stressed that operating cash flow has remained positive, and was at $130 million in the third quarter. “The insurance company’s liquidity resources remain more than adequate to meet anticipated claim payments,” the company said in a press statement. “We continually evaluate our housing-related exposures and adjust our loss reserve and impairment estimates whenever deal performance does not track with expectations,” said MBIA CEO Jay Brown. “This was the case in the third quarter, and we increased our loss reserves and impairments by approximately $1 billion to reflect our analysis of the impact of weakening economic conditions and a greater number of defaults on improperly originated and serviced mortgage loans.” For more information, visit http://www.mbia.com. Write to Paul Jackson at [email protected]. Disclosure: The author held no relevant investment positions when this story was published. Indirect holdings may exist via mutual fund investments. HW reporters and writers follow a strict disclosure policy, the first in the mortgage trade.
Most Popular Articles
“Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres.” All Gaul is divided into three parts. Julius Caesar used those words more than 2,000 years ago to begin an account of military conquest. America’s housing affordability challenge might be described similarly. Like Gaul of yore, it divides into three parts: talk, action, and outcomes. Identifying the three […]
-
Why we can’t get more housing construction in the US
Jun 24, 2026 -
Fannie Mae to expand title pilot program, Pulte says
Jun 24, 2026 -
Housing demand holds steady as regional inventory trends reshape the market
Jun 25, 2026 -
Young buyers are priced out in most U.S. metros, Pew data shows
Jun 25, 2026 -
Mortgage performance steady in May as calendar drives delinquency bump
Jun 26, 2026
Latest Articles
Taylor Morrison’s proxy outlining the history and process behind its recently announced acquisition by Berkshire Hathaway makes for interesting reading, especially because the process differed from what many had assumed. It was far more of a deliberate sale than a case of Berkshire Hathaway swooping in to buy the company. The transaction, and the path by […]
-
Luxury buyers shift as AI wealth rises, says The Agency
-
The best real estate offer is not always the highest price, here’s how to spot risk
-
Julia Gordon named senior fellow at Center for Affordable Housing Lending
-
Bed Bath & Beyond sets road map built around three housing pilots
-
The new real estate playbook is getting cited by AI, not clicked on