The chairman of appraisal technology firm a la mode remains stunned over accusations lobbed at his company by a trade group that represents appraisal management companies (AMCs) and questions the assertions being made. The Title/Appraisal Vendor Management Association (TAVMA) publicly criticized the data in a la mode’s Appraisal Fee Reference, claiming it doesn’t include the fees AMCs pay to appraisers, creating confusion in the industry. The reference is a collection of appraisal fee reports. In a prepared statement to HousingWire, Dave Biggers, chairman of the privately-owned a la mode, said his company was “dismayed and shocked,” adding TAVMA went too far in its accusations. “In the 25 years that a la mode has been serving the lending and real estate industries, I can’t recall a single incident in which a trade organization has singled out and attacked an individual company in this manner,” Biggers said. “They claimed that our company provided misleading information to the industry. They should know better.” Instead, Biggers said, TAVMA should have “simply said…they don’t agree,” or provided an alternative analysis and debated the issue in an objective manner. In addition, Biggers questioned TAVMA’s assertions of its AMC members’ role in the market. In its statement this week, TAVMA said AMCs are “the major provider of appraisal services in the country” and that independent appraisers are “a small sub-group of the industry.” But Biggers argued that position contradicts previous TAVMA statements, including a January 2009 position paper (download here), where TAVMA states that “AMCs are not appraisers, nor do they perform appraisals.” In its statement Monday, TAVMA compared a la mode’s dataset to hardware prices determined only by mom-and-pop hardware stores and ignoring giant retailers Home Depot (HD) and Lowe’s (LOW), an assertion Biggers contested. “That implies that appraisers and AMCs are the same type of entities, simply differing in scale,” Biggers said. “If TAVMA’s AMC members are indeed simply large discount appraisal shops, as they appear to suggest repeatedly here, they would be subject to the very strict standards imposed by state appraisal boards.” “I’m confident that the various state regulatory boards will be intrigued by their latest public statements,” Biggers added. HousingWire requested to speak with Biggers, but a spokesperson for the company declined, citing that the issue is a “legal matter now.” The spokesperson declined to comment on whether a la mode was considering legal action against TAVMA. Write to Austin Kilgore. The author held no relevant investments.
Most Popular Articles
The hidden cost of leverage: Why today’s real estate investors need to be more conservative than ever
In today’s high-cost market, excessive leverage can quickly turn a profitable property into a financial liability. Investors must prioritize conservative underwriting and consistent cash flow over extracting maximum equity.
Jun 30, 2026
-
Why Carlisle Companies targets Owens Corning for an M&A combo
Jun 30, 2026 -
Introducing the 2026 Women of Influence
Jul 01, 2026 -
Why mortgage rates are rising, not falling, with oil under $70
Jul 01, 2026 -
GSEs release historical FICO 10T data, expand VantageScore 4.0 file
Jul 01, 2026 -
Berkshire’s Clayton adds McGuinn Homes to Mungo as scale race widens
Jul 01, 2026
Latest Articles
Reffkin takes the stand, MRED CEO says Zillow threatened litigation over listing policy dispute
Compass and MRED leaders testified Zillow threatened litigation over listing access standards, briefs due July 9 and July 13.
-
Government-backed modular housing trend arrives in Cleveland
-
Will the ROAD Act change what pencils for multifamily rentals?
-
First MLS names Jenni Bonura chief growth officer
-
RealTrends Verified The Craig Tann Group continues decade of growth
-
MISMO updates mortgage insurance data guide for VantageScore 4.0 and FICO 10T