US District Judge Sidney Stein on Monday denied a request by Citigroup (C) to dismiss a class-action suit by a group of pension funds and an insurance company that purchased bonds issued between May 2006 and August 2008. The case involves 48 bond offerings from which Citigroup was said to have raised more than $71bn while allegedly “failing to truthfully and fully disclose critical information about its financial condition to investors, notably information pertaining to its ‘toxic mortgage-linked exposures.'” In particular, the plaintiffs allege that Citigroup did not disclose details of its exposure to $66bn worth of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and $100bn of structured investment vehicles (SIVs) backed by subprime mortgages. The once popular SIVs are long-term asset products funded via short-term paper. Citi absorbed its SIVs in December 2007. Plaintiffs contend that Citigroup made materially untrue or misleading statements or omissions in public offering materials associated with 48 bond issuances between May 2006 and August 2008. They also claim Citigroup underestimated reserves necessary to cover losses on the underlying subprime mortgages. Citigroup requested the court to dismiss the class action complaint, stating that the “plaintiffs lack standing to pursue many of their claims.” Additionally, Citigroup contended that the remaining claims “sound in fraud” and should be subject to stricter requirements, and that even if those stricter requirements do not apply, the plaintiffs failed to identify “an actionable misstatement or omission” and therefore does not present a plausible claim. Judge Stein, in an opinion Monday, denied Citigroup’s motion to dismiss the bondholder claims with respect to the CDO holdings and the credit quality of its SIV holdings once those holdings were consolidated in December 2007. In a statement e-mailed to HousingWire, Citigroup said it would “vigorously defend the remaining claims” by the plaintiffs. The judge’s opinion dismissed several claims against Citigroup, regarding its exposure to $11bn of auction-rate securities (ARS) and its exposure to its SIV holdings before consolidation in December 2007. Write to Diana Golobay. Disclosure: the author holds no relevant investments.
District Judge Upholds Mortgage Bondholder Suit Against Citigroup
July 13, 2010, 12:41pm
Diana Golobay was a reporter with HousingWire through mid-2010, providing wide-ranging coverage of the U.S. financial crisis. She has since moved onto other roles as a writer and editor.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Why housing demand is up and inventory is down in 2026
Pending sales rose to 75,856 vs 72,039 in 2025 as inventory turned negative year over year with mortgage rates near 6.58%.
Jun 13, 2026
-
HUD tests a new Operation Breakthrough for today’s housing crisis
Jun 23, 2026 -
SERHANT. expands into Texas with 13 founding agents
Jun 23, 2026 -
Keys to the housing market for the rest of 2026
Jun 20, 2026 -
Trump abruptly delays signing of 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act
Jun 24, 2026 -
Fannie Mae to expand title pilot program, Pulte says
Jun 24, 2026
Latest Articles
KB Home Q2 2026 earnings point to scale vs execution debate
Homebuilding’s mid-year public company earnings season is now looking through the prism of the back half of 2026. Each of the sector’s players had better have put themselves in a good position for some heavy lifting and outperformance, rather than lugging around a forgettable first half. In that light, it’s welcome news that one of […]
Diana Golobay was a reporter with HousingWire through mid-2010, providing wide-ranging coverage of the U.S. financial crisis. She has since moved onto other roles as a writer and editor.see full bio