One of the reasons I write for HousingWire is to bring the data-based insights of asset-backed research into the public babelogue over the causes and cures of the financial crisis. A chore I thought was needful, as it appears to me—from media coverage, loads of testimony delivered to Congress, and pontifications of elected representatives and government officials—that everyone blames securitization in whole or part, but few are circulating facts. By and large, they haven’t got a clue. Most perplexing to me, having worked since the mid-90s with rich loan level data available for private MBS, are assertions that the market did not have enough information about the characteristics of the loans being securitized to make informed decisions. That mistake appears to be most recently incarnated in campaigns to enhance the disclosure provided for securities at the time of offering and ongoing over the life of the transaction. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) surged onto the field late last year with a proposed securitization rule for insured depository institutions (IDI) that includes a disclosure component. It has been marketed by its authors as a necessary step to restart private securitization of home mortgages and greeted in the blogosphere as a bold step forward for transparency. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), whose statutory responsibility it is to set disclosure requirements for primary and secondary market issues, has been reviewing its regulation of ABS securitization and is on the verge of releasing proposed new rules. I disagree with the brouhaha over disclosure. I think the FDIC is out of its element, and the SEC’s efforts are misaimed, however necessary politically. Mine are not popular views outside the bank huddle (to which I also don’t subscribe), so let’s sort this month’s Kitchen Sink before some pundito tries to switch on the garbage disposal. Doth the FDIC Dis Reg AB? What can an issuer not know, or not have access to, that is material? And which MBS market does the FDIC and its pals want to revive? Alt-A? Subprime? Nontraditional loans like Option ARMs or interest-only fixed? Get these answers, and so much more, with a subscription to HousingWire.
Linda Lowell is a 20-year-plus veteran of MBS and ABS research at a handful of Wall Street firms. She is currently principal of OffStreet Research LLC in New York.see full bio
Most Popular Articles
Foreclosures climb 21% in first half of 2026, pushed by higher stress in FHA, VA mortgages
U.S. foreclosure activity rose again in the first half of 2026, with 227,548 properties receiving filings, up 21% from the same period in 2025, according to ATTOM’s midyear foreclosure report.
Jul 16, 2026
-
The housing market’s inventory rebound is shifting power to buyers, but not everywhere
Jul 17, 2026 -
UHM acquires AmeriTrust assets, expands non-QM footprint
Jul 17, 2026 -
Can the housing market weather Iran conflict 2.0 and higher rates?
Jul 18, 2026 -
The housing market not normalizing, as affordability failure persists
Jul 20, 2026 -
Mortgage volumes point to bank share gains in Q2
Jul 20, 2026
Latest Articles
The architecture of trust in the age of AI
Mortgage accountability depends on reconstructable processes, but many AI tools do not preserve decision records in an auditable way. In a multi-vendor stack, the risk concentrates at interfaces, increasing compliance and repurchase exposure.
-
For better building codes, a more deliberate course is overdue
-
Will Trump’s new Canadian tariffs add cost risk for builders?
-
D.R. Horton bets operating rigor will outperform uncertain demand
-
The JMG acquisition gives teams leverage, but not equal valuations
-
Investors list more homes after ROAD to Housing Act, but impact may stay local
Linda Lowell is a 20-year-plus veteran of MBS and ABS research at a handful of Wall Street firms. She is currently principal of OffStreet Research LLC in New York.see full bio