Top trade organizations support barring use of Fannie, Freddie g-fees for federal spending

Mortgage bankers, Realtors, mortgage insurers, others support bill

A consortium of the housing industry’s top trade organizations declared their collective support for an ongoing effort in Congress to permanently bar the use of funds raised from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s guarantee fees to cover federal spending in areas not related to mortgages.

The support came via a letter sent recently to Rep. Mark Sanford, R-SC, along with Rep. Brad Sherman, D-CA, the sponsors of the Risk Management and Homeowner Stability Act of 2017, tagged in the House as H.R. 916.

Earlier this year, Sanford and Sherman introduced the bill, which would amend the Budget Control Act of 1974 to ensure that guarantee fees cannot be used to offset spending unrelated to protecting the mortgage market.

And in a letter sent to Sanford and Sherman, the American Bankers Association, the American Land Title Association, the Community Mortgage Lenders of America, the Consumer Mortgage Coalition, the Credit Union National Association, Habitat for Humanity International, the Housing Policy Council of the Financial Services Roundtable, the Independent Community Bankers of America, Leading Builders of America, the Mortgage Bankers Association, the National Association of Federal Credit Unions, the National Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Realtors, and U.S. Mortgage Insurers stated their support for the bill.

“The undersigned organizations want to thank you for reintroducing H.R. 916, the Risk Management and Homeowner Stability Act,” the letter begins.

“G-fees are a critical risk management tool used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to protect against losses from loans that default,” the letter continues. “Increasing g-fees for other purposes imposes an unjustified burden on homeowners who would pay for any increase through higher monthly payments for the life of their loan.”

The groups’ letter continues: “Our organizations were deeply troubled when g-fees were raised back in 2011 to fund a two-month extension of payroll tax relief – a tax that homebuyers and owners will continue to pay until 2021. Since then, whenever Congress has considered using g-fees to cover the cost of programs unrelated to housing, we’ve informed lawmakers that homeownership cannot, and must not, be used as the nation’s piggybank.”

The groups conclude by urging the full House of Representatives to consider the bill.

“By preventing g-fees from being scored as a funding offset, H.R. 916 gives lawmakers a vital tool to prevent homeowners from footing the bill for unrelated spending,” the letter closes. “We are grateful to you for introducing this bipartisan legislation and urge its consideration by the House.”

Most Popular Articles

Sales of new houses will rise to a 13-year high in 2020, NAR’s chief economist says

Sales of new homes probably will rise to a 13-year high in 2020 as the U.S. dodges a recession, according to Lawrence Yun, chief economist of the National Association of Realtors.

Nov 08, 2019 By