The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision preserving birthright citizenship is unlikely to produce an immediate surge in home sales, but it could bolster something the housing market has lacked — confidence.

For many affected households weighing whether to buy a first home, the ruling removes at least one layer of uncertainty surrounding their long-term future in the U.S.

That reassurance may not outweigh stubborn affordability challenges, but it could encourage some families to move forward with major financial decisions they had delayed, Cotality Chief Economist Selma Hepp told HousingWire.

“The impact is meaningful for confidence for immigrant communities, because it’s not just about citizenship rights, it’s about the financial future and the ability to hold a job in the U.S.,” she said. “[It affects time] spent in deciding where a kid goes to school and all those sort of decisions that feed into households.

“I think maybe the biggest thing is improvement in consumer confidence, rather than some meaningful impact on the economy immediately.”

Research from the American Immigration Council found immigrant households are a major driver of housing demand and neighborhood stability — making confidence and long-term certainty critical to homeownership decisions.

First-time buyers, multi-generation households

While existing homeowners often have more flexibility, Hepp said uncertainty weighs especially heavily on prospective first-time buyers deciding whether to make the largest purchase of their lives.

“It’s still a lot about affordability,” she said. “Maybe you’re talking about Hispanic buyers. Depending on what the income status is, there tends to be multiple co-signers. So, when there’s certainty for each individual within that household, that weighs on their decision, as well. It’s particularly complicated.”

According to the International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Hispanic households are most likely to co-reside with multiple generations — followed by Asian and African American households.

Hispanic households added a net gain of 441,000 owner-households in 2025 — the largest single-year increase since the U.S. Census Bureau began collecting the data in 1975.

Without Hispanic buyers, the total number of U.S. homeowners would have declined by 125,000 households last year, data from the National Association for Hispanic Real Estate Professionals shows.

Gateway, tech markets may feel greatest effects

Hepp said large gateway cities with sizable immigrant populations could experience the most noticeable effects of the Supreme Court ruling — along with technology-driven metropolitan areas that attract international workers.

“That’s New York, Miami, L.A.,” she said. “You have groups that buy in high-tech markets that are tied to AI and biotech. These are high-income communities like the Bay Area and Seattle or even San Diego and Austin.”

Hepp also noted slowing demand experienced by builders in parts of Texas, but said separating immigration-related uncertainty from broader housing headwinds remains difficult.

“It’s hard to exactly parse out, but I think it’s a significant contributor in markets in which there tends to be higher [immigrant] populations,” she said.

Advice for agents, long-term stability

Hepp cited that the Supreme Court ruling does not alter existing fair housing obligations for real estate professionals.

She advised agents to focus on ensuring clients have access to reliable information while avoiding steering or disparate treatment.

“I think you know the fair housing rules haven’t changed,” she said. “Nothing changes with you being on top of the information that relates specifically to them. Ensure that they have access to the right information through their networks — somebody who they trust.”

Psychological stability reaches beyond housing

Although housing affordability continues to dominate market conditions, Hepp believes broader societal impact of preserving birthright citizenship extends well beyond home sales.

She explained how stability in legal status influences labor markets, household formation, demographic trends and future economic growth — all of which ultimately shape housing demand.

“The repercussions down the road are huge,” Hepp said. “The psychological or emotional immediate impact is really important right now. [The Supreme Court ruling provides] some level of confidence that decisions you made over 30 or 40 years are not going to be changed in a second.”

While mortgage rates, affordability and inventory will continue to determine much of the housing market’s direction, buyer confidence and stability remains an essential ingredient for homeownership.

For many prospective buyers, the Supreme Court’s ruling may not make homes more affordable, but it may provide the certainty needed to begin planning for one.

More: