David Rasmussen, senior vice president, operations for Veros, is responsible for the operational logistics of Veros' numerous valuation analytic and system strategies. With more than 19 years of experience in the mortgage industry, he has directed Veros' advancement of mortgage-related enterprise risk management systems and collateral valuation services. Focusing on customer-centric business development and product deployment strategies, Rasmussen has worked to expand industry understanding and access of these tools for workflow efficiencies through innovative and practical business applications. Rasmussen graduated from Brigham Young University and is MCSE certified.
While 2018 will be a tougher year for lenders, originators can still generate solid revenue and profit for their institutions with effective marketing and loan fulfillment programs. Better than that, by focusing their efforts on the right products, they will also have the opportunity to build stronger relationships with existing bank customers and credit union members, positioning themselves for additional business when volume increases in the future. Here are the three keys to succeed in this business.
In the days following the 2016 election, business leaders across many industries were hopeful that the new president would make good on his promise of widespread deregulation. Banks and other financial institutions were especially optimistic. Here at last was the relief they had been looking for. Or not.
Even Hollywood knows better than to produce a sequel when the original movie is truly, horrifically bad. That’s why, thankfully, we haven’t seen sequels to such all-time cinematic disasters as Howard the Duck, Gigli, The Last Airbender, Jack and Jill, Glitter, or Battlefield Earth. Which brings us, in an admittedly roundabout way, to the question of whether we’re about to see a sequel of sorts in the mortgage industry: The Return of the Subprime Loan.
With FHFA director Mel Watt’s term due to expire in January 2019, the question of whether to move ahead on some version of administrative reform may rest with his successor. In the meantime, policy makers would be well-served to work together to come to some agreement on options for administrative reform. At a minimum, agreeing on a common definition would be a good first step.