Reporting From Washington — If there is a term that strikes fear in the hearts of residential lenders everywhere, it is “cramdown.” Lenders dread the judicial procedure that erases a portion of a borrower’s mortgage because the house, which is the underlying security or collateral for the loan, is worth less than what is owed on it. Actually, the word is a euphemism for forcing a ruling upon a creditor, as in “crammed down” the lender’s throat. The proper term is “bifurcation,” meaning that in a bankruptcy proceeding the loan is split into a secured claim equal to the current appraised value of the property and an unsecured claim equal to the difference between the unpaid balance and the home’s present value. Generally, the borrower is required to continue to pay on the secured portion, while the difference is treated like any other unsecured debt.
Debate might give new life to mortgage cramdown legislation
Most Popular Articles
Latest Articles
Pennymac posts first-quarter profit of $39M
Loan production income shrank in the first quarter, but the company’s servicing business continues to grow
-
DOJ charges one of America’s top LOs in alleged mortgage fraud scheme
-
Top Producer Review: Features, pricing & alternatives
-
A&D Mortgage names new servicing manager
-
HUD aims to help protect communities from extreme heat
-
Freedom Mortgage founder addresses ’extraordinary’ credit profiles, profitability and products