Greg Smith’s “Why I am leaving Goldman Sachs” op-ed got lots of attention, but a federal judge in Manhattan has far more damaging things to say about the investment bank’s practices, notes Alison Frankel of Reuters in her “On the Case” blog.

Frankel brings attention to a 64-page ruling by U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero of Manhattan who details Goldman’s institutional efforts to secretly reverse its own long position in residential mortgage-backed securities as it allegedly duped clients into buying the instruments. 

Many are familiar with the scrutinized Abacus deal. Marrero’s preliminary ruling “greenlights most securities and common law fraud claims by investors in two other rigged-to-fail CDOs, Hudson 1 and Hudson 2,” Frankel writes. And although Marrero’s writing may not have the flair of others, it’s a devastating ruling, she said.

Read Frankel’s full column here.

Most Popular Articles

Here are the mortgage lenders that borrowers like the most

J.D. Power’s 2019 U.S. Primary Mortgage Origination Satisfaction Study, released Thursday morning, showed that there are some lenders that customers seem to love working with more than others. Here are the ones that borrowers are partial to.

Nov 14, 2019 By

Latest Articles

Congressional vote on “de facto QM Patch” postponed

The House Financial Services Committee postponed a vote on H.R. 2445 on Wednesday, a bill that would fix the so-called QM Patch that’s set to expire in early 2021.

Nov 15, 2019 By