Is it possible that Diana Olick over at CNBC completely stole my story on the FHASecure program, in terms of the how the numbers are being fudged? I published my look inside the numbers yesterday; Olick's piece came out today and says exactly the same thing. No credit given. I'm not trying to be high and mighty here, but I've been seeing quite a bit of this sort of day-or-two-later replication taking place lately by mainstream journalists. It can't all be coincidence. Is it any wonder I'm moving to reinvent HW in the weeks ahead?