True Stories: Hybrid, eNote and RON Implementation

Join expert panelists that will discuss the status of federal legislation, trends in digital adoption and how best to prepare your organization for the next generation of lending processes.

Spruce’s Patrick Burns on innovation in title technology

In the season finale of Housing News season 5, Spruce CEO discusses heightened investor interest in title tech, innovation and fintech adoption.

Top CFPB official “hates” QM rules, jeopardizing safe harbor

A top CFPB official in charge of the rule-making process has heavily criticized the agency's own qualifying mortgage rule, jeopardizing safe harbor.

Fraud risk factors at closing increased almost 90% last quarter

A variety of risk factors could be contributing to the drastic increase in wire and title fraud risk factors in mortgage and real estate closings – for example, compliance issues and an increase in transaction data errors.


Will alternative credit scores really help close more mortgages?

Panel disputes the merit

Alternative credit scoring is a pretty big buzz term going around the industry these days.

The most recent HousingWire cover story revolves, and goes much deeper (paywall), into this very same issue.

On a related topic, the Progressive Policy Institute recently held a luncheon, see the video below, with experts to try to find if efforts to move past FICO would really help serve underserved markets.

Will alternative credit scores really help close more mortgages?

The answer is not conclusive.

“I think this is what most consumer advocates are interested in, is that it will potentially expand mortgage markets,” said Ann Schnare, president of Schnare Associates and former senior vice president at Freddie Mac.

“The problem with that is most of them have scores that are relatively low. If you look at the borrowers that might actually be potential candidates for a mortgage the number is roughly around two million,” Schnare adds. “And they got that number by eliminating borrowers with FICO Scores below 620, by eliminating people under 25 or over 70, by eliminating any existing homeowners.”

“So, two million seems to be an agreed upon figure, but the problem with that is it is also too high,” she concluded.

Fellow panelist Tom Parrent, a principal at Quantalitic agreed the number of those who would be able to handle a mortgage is much lower.

“Well, in any given year what we found was that number is under 50 thousand people out of the two million that you would expand, you’d only get an additional 50 thousand or so, who would be likely to want a mortgage and be able to obtain one with the other underwriting standards,” he said.

“We happen to think that it is a good idea for people to have a path into the mainstream financial system with accurate transparent scores,” he said. “But, what’s not clear to us at all is that this would make much of a difference in the mortgage market.”

Full panel video available here.

Most Popular Articles

Volume-hungry mortgage lenders loosen credit standards

Mortgage credit availability loosened up in April by 2.2%, per the MBA. The drivers were in conventional mortgages and GSE programs for ARMs and high-balance loans.

May 11, 2021 By

Latest Articles

Compass loses money, explores mortgage

Compass is exploring either building a mortgage arm, buying a mortgage company or following the lead of other resi brokerages and entering into a JV.

May 12, 2021 By
3d rendering of a row of luxury townhouses along a street

Log In

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account? Please