An Insider’s Look Into How Secondary Marketing Evaluates LOs

In this webinar we’ll explore the long-term financial impacts of renegotiations, extensions and fallouts, plus basic guidelines to be viewed as a professional by your secondary marketing department

HousingWire Annual Virtual Summit

Sessions from HousingWire Annual 2021 are going to be virtually streamed on October 25. Register now for FREE to tune into what housing industry leaders had to say this year!

How servicers can access timely, accurate data insights

Learn how to navigate the challenges in today’s market – for example, the need for ongoing, on-demand access to near-real-time data and the ability to access those data insights in a timely and accurate manner.

Steve Murray on new brokerage models, CFPB crackdowns

Today’s HousingWire Daily features a discussion on the emergence of a new brokerage model and the validity behind the concerns against institutional investors.

Bombshell: Treasury now claims Fannie, Freddie bailout wasn’t loan

Calls sweep recovery for “investment”; Dodges questions on privilege

In a letter that’s going to raise more questions than it answers, the Treasury Department replied to an interrogatory from a U.S. Senator on its “third amendment sweep” of profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Joe Light has the story:

In its response to Mr. Grassley on Tuesday, the Treasury Department for the first time clearly laid out its response. In a nutshell, according to the department: The bailout wasn’t a loan, but an investment on which taxpayers are now being compensated.

After getting taken over by the U.S. government, mortgage-finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac took a bailout of about $187.5 billion. In return for that money, the government acquired a class of “senior preferred” stock that initially paid a 10% dividend.

To date, the companies have paid the government more than $228 billion, $40 billion more than they took in the bailout.

That’s led some of the companies’ shareholders, and some politicians, to argue that the companies should be allowed to retain earnings, having repaid the “loan” Treasury extended them during the crisis.

In the letter to Mr. Grassley, Acting Assistant Secretary for Legislative Affairs Randall DeValk wrote that the government “did not make an ordinary loan” to Fannie and Freddie, but rather that it “took on an enormous risk when rescuing the enterprises in the middle of a financial crisis – a risk for which any private investor would have demanded substantial compensation.” He wrote that taxpayers continue to bear risks from Fannie and Freddie which in part explains why the companies’ profits continue to be swept.

Read the full story here.

Most Popular Articles

FHFA to make desktop appraisals permanent

Desktop appraisals, a temporary flexibility implemented in March 2020 amid lockdowns and social distancing, will become permanent, the FHFA said today.

Oct 18, 2021 By
3d rendering of a row of luxury townhouses along a street

Log In

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account? Please