Things at Ocwen just went from bad to much, much worse

Things at Ocwen just went from bad to much, much worse

Embattled company hit with an avalanche of bad news

Pending home sales surge to highest level in 18 months

Buyer demand boosts sales

Foreclosure: The Movie… (finally!) coming to a screen near you

In new film, neighborhood of foreclosed homes drives man insane
W S

REwired

new REwired blog header
Opinion, commentary and analysis on everything that makes the U.S. housing economy tick -- not to mention the ghosts in the machine, too. Written by HW's team of editors and reporters each business day.
Lending

Is affordable lending not so affordable?

June 21, 2013

It’s been five years since the housing market collapsed leading to a period of substantial chaos across the financial system and real estate industry.

But several years out, a new market has yet to emerge, and the true reason for policymakers slow response has more to do with the fundamental debate underpinning today’s proposals for reforming the mortgage finance system.  

The biggest elephant in the room is the inability for policymakers to agree on whether policies denoted as ‘affordable housing’ initiatives really help American homeowners or simply set borrowers up to fail.

Ed Pinto, a former GSE executive and fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, continues to argue against the government’s new push for affordable or flexible lending.

At a time, when many in mortgage finance are pushing for flexibility to get more families into mortgages, Pinto is asking policymakers to pound the breaks on the allowance of government subsidies that create artificial lifts in the mortgage finance space.

"Proponents of Subprime 2.0 say a government centric housing system is necessary to assure flexibility, accessibility, affordability and stability. We know from the last experiment that flexibility means subprime lending, accessibility means entitlements, affordability means subsidies, and stability means increasing leverage during boom times," he wrote.

"For example, achieving flexibility would require the widespread use of subprime loans with low down payments, low credit-score requirements and high debt-to-income ratios. Such a system is doomed to failure."

Pinto continues to push for sound underwriting, strong downpayments and prime quality loans as the real drivers of sustainable homeownership.

Click here to read the full editorial.

 

Comments powered by Disqus