Zillow: Top 10 markets to buy and sell your home now

Wealthier Americans mean a bigger bond market

More liquidity means more debt

Top 10 fastest growing cities in the nation

Most already home to thousands of millennials

Wells Fargo details risk-retention rules it seeks

/ Print / Reprints /
| Share More
/ Text Size+
Wells Fargo (WFC) is telling regulators exactly what kind of risk the bank is willing to retain under the new provisions of Dodd-Frank. Under the reform, federal regulators must determine what mortgages an originator should still be on the hook for after the loans are packaged and sold in the secondary market. Wells Fargo said risk retention, for both agency and nonagency mortgages, should include an early payment-default provision covering up to the first three months of a loan and a 5% vertical slice of retained credit risk on top of the standard representations and warranties. The bank, which is the largest mortgage originator in the U.S., is also calling for a more simple and narrow definition of a qualified residential mortgage, one that is exempt from risk retention. Wells Fargo doesn't want a broad definition that encompasses most of the mortgage market because it "will produce a tendency to avoid lending to credit-worthy borrowers falling outside that definition," as fewer lenders are willing to hold on to risk. The American Securitization Forum said risk retention is key in establishing a sound mortgage securitization market. Wells Fargo added in a letter to regulators that a broader definition would create a national underwriting standard, which the bank believes is not adaptable to every individual borrower's assessment for a loan. "A simpler definition offers the advantages of avoiding unintentional orphaning of a segment of borrowers, requiring less maintenance over time," the bank said. Wells Fargo said mortgages with a 70% loan-to-value ratio or below should qualify as exempt. Its effort is contrary to many other banks in the mortgage space. Write to Christine Ricciardi. Disclosure: The author holds no relevant investments.

Recent Articles by Christine Ricciardi

Comments powered by Disqus