The New York Times rambles, and mangles mortgages along the way

The New York Times rambles, and mangles mortgages along the way

Mortgage finance and mortgage regulation aren’t the paper’s strong suits

WATCH: Trulia stages haunted house for unsuspecting homebuyers

'Tis the season. For screaming.

10 reasons why people don’t get a mortgage

It’s not just because of finances
W S
Lending / The Ticker

Insurers find Dodd-Frank loophole

Argument still up for debate

pile of paper
/ Print / Reprints /
| Share More
/ Text Size+

According to an article in The Wall Street Journal, a slight quirk in the text of Dodd-Frank may make life easier for some of the biggest U.S. insurers.

They argue the Federal Reserve should look to state-insurance rules to craft capital requirements for insurers designated as systemically important financial institutions. That task is complicated by the fact that state rules rely heavily on third-party credit ratings, while the Dodd-Frank Act ordered all federal regulators to strip ratings from their rules.

In this case, the devil is very much in the Dodd-Frank details. The language of the financial-overhaul law doesn't actually contain a prohibition on rules relying on credit ratings. Rather, one section, 939A, instructed federal agencies to do three things.

Source: WSJ
Read full story

Recent Articles by Brena Swanson

Comments powered by Disqus