CFPB doubles down against marketing services agreements

CFPB doubles down against marketing services agreements

Underscores that MSAs could constitute mortgage kickbacks

Did Sen. Corker violate SEC rules, Senate ethics by telling investors to short GSEs?

Made questionable remarks on CNBC regarding stocks

House passes bipartisan TRID grace period bill 303-121

Next comes Senate, then looming threat of veto from White House
Lending / The Ticker

MBA urges FHA to adopt QM safe harbor

Questions whether rebuttable presumption is necessary

home loans chalk

The Mortgage Bankers Association sent a letter to the Federal Housing Administration Friday, asking the agency to treat all FHA-insured loans as Qualified Mortgages with the heightened safe-harbor legal standard attached.

"MBA strongly believes that if the HUD QM rule is finalized correctly, it will foster sound and sustainable FHA-insured mortgage financing for consumers," explained MBA senior vice president of public policy and industry relations Stephen O'Connor. 

The distinction between the FHA QM safe harbor and the FHA QM rebuttable presumption loans for FHA-insured loans should be eliminated for various reasons, including the fact that the distinction is unnecessary under this government program, MBA said.

Additionally, establishing this dichotomy will add significant regulatory burden. Consequently, if the higher priced FHA-insured loans carry a rebuttable presumption, they will be costlier if it's available at all, MBA argued. 

If HUD seeks to move forward with implementation at the start of the new year, MBA believes all FHA-insured loans should be treated as QM safe harbor mortgages early on.

However, if HUD chooses to maintain a rebuttable presumption, the basis for rebutting it should be revised, the trade group claims.

Click here to read the letter in its entirety. 

Recent Articles by Christina Mlynski

Comments powered by Disqus