Lawsuit alleges former LandCastle Title CEO embezzled $30 million

Lawsuit alleges former LandCastle Title CEO embezzled $30 million

Nat Hardwick allegedly used funds for private jets, gambling

Fannie Mae: Lenders ask these 4 questions about MSRs

All about transfer and execution

Fidelity National bails out Landcastle Title

Discovered “substantial account misappropriations”
W S
Servicing

Nevada Supreme Court holds MERS assignments valid

The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in two separate cases that a mortgage assignment from Merscorp, parent company of registry Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, does not invalidate a foreclosure. 

MERS is the electronic mortgage registry that ended up in the limelight when issues arose about securitized loans. MERS was created to record mortgage assignments as loans move through the securitization process. 

In the Volkes v. BAC Home Loans Servicing case, the plaintiff claimed a foreclosure was invalidated by a MERS loan assignment. The Nevada Supreme Court validated the assignment, saying it does not impede on MERS ability to foreclose. 

The court made a similar ruling in U.S. Bank v. Davis, saying, "We reject appellants' contention that the assignment was invalid solely by virtue of its connection to MERS."

MERS responded to the case saying, "The Nevada Supreme Court has made it unquestionably clear that the MERS business model complies with Nevada law." 

 kpanchuk@housingwire.com 

Recent Articles by Kerri Panchuk

Comments powered by Disqus