RSS Twitter

Archive for November, 2011

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

Las Vegas is no longer the top foreclosure city in the country. A new Nevada law that went into effect in October caused many mortgage servicers to pause the foreclosure process, knocking Vegas off the spot it held held for 22 consecutive months, RealtyTrac said in a report Thursday.

The top spot now belongs to Stockton, Calif., where one in every 143 homes received a foreclosure filing in October. Las Vegas dropped to No. 5.

More than 230,600 U.S. properties received a foreclosure filing in October, a 7% increase from the previous month. It's another sign servicers are beginning to restart a process held up after months of delays to correct mistakes that surfaced one year ago, according to RealtyTrac.

“The October foreclosure numbers continue to show strong signs that foreclosure activity is coming out of the rain delay we’ve been in for the past year as lenders corrected foreclosure paperwork and processing problems," CEO James Saccacio said. "However, recent state court rulings and new state laws keep changing the rules of the foreclosure game on the fly, creating more uncertainty in the housing market and threatening to prolong the road to a robust real estate recovery."

Nevada state Assembly Bill 284 took effect Oct. 1, making it a felony if a mortgage servicer or trustee commits false representations concerning a title. There will also be a $5,000 fine assessed if fraud, such as robo-signing, is detected.

Servicers are required to provide a new affidavit that provides the amount due on the mortgage, who is in possession of the note and who has the authority to foreclose.

Although Las Vegas doesn't hold the top foreclosure rate among cities anymore, the state of Nevada is still plagued by foreclosure problems. One in every 180 homes in Nevada received a foreclosure filing in October. Despite that being a 34% drop from the previous month, it's the still the state with the highest foreclosure rate in the country for the 58th consecutive month.

Officials within the Nevada attorney general's office sat down with servicers in October to clarify the law and to continue working on a model affidavit that would satisfy the requirements.

"I'm confident we can move forward with nonjudicial foreclosures," said Cathe Cole at the time. She is the vice president of default for Trustee Corps., a designated foreclosure counsel for Freddie Mac. "Some are just waiting for what the uniform affidavits are."

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, whose firm represented Freddie Mac at the height of the housing bubble, advocated abolishing Freddie and Fannie Mae during a Wednesday night GOP debate focused largely on the economy.

Gingrich also took another jab at Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke while Rep. Michele Bachman (R-Minn.) said she'd repeal the Dodd-Frank Act if she's elected president.

Republican presidential candidates' had a variety of ideas on how to solve the housing crisis during the debate “Your Money, Your Vote” broadcast on CNBC, which said housing has lost $7 trillion since 2007.

Now five years into the housing crisis, the sector remains sluggish with some 4 million people behind on mortgage payments or in foreclosure and nearly 23% of residential properties upside down.

Gingrich was asked what he did with $300,000 that Freddie paid his firm in 2006.

"I offered them advice on precisely what they didn’t do," Gingrich said, causing the audience to laugh and applaud.

Gingrich denied that he was lobbying on behalf of Freddie Mac to prevent the Bush administration from curbing the GSEs' power.

"I said to them at the time, 'This is a bubble. This is insane. This is impossible.' It turned out, unfortunately, I was right," Gingrich said. "I think this is a good case for breaking up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and getting much smaller institutions back into the private sector to be competitive and to be responsible for their behavior."

When asked if he would shut the GSEs down even if it meant higher interest rates for Americans, making it more difficult for Americans to obtain home loans, former Godfather Pizza CEO Herman Cain said he would first "fix the real problem, which is growing the economy,' by implementing his "bold" 9-9-9 plan.

Cain said he would then move the GSEs "out of the way" so that small and medium-sized banks would have more certainty and be in a better position to help homeowners "reset" their mortgages. After doing that, he would turn the GSEs into private entities.

"The government does not need to be in that business," he said. "I would find a way to unwind Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac such that the marketplace can determine the future of the housing market."

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney reiterated his previous view that the foreclosure process should play out so that the housing market can recover and free markets can work.

We "have to allow the economy reboot," he said. "The best thing you can do for housing is to get the economy going and get people working again," he said.

"What we know won’t work is what this president's done, which is try to hold off the foreclosure process — the normal market process — to put money into a stimulus that failed, and to put in place a whole series of policies from Obama-care to Dodd-Frank that have made it hard for this economy to get going," he said.

Since February 2010, 2.7 million jobs have been created but the housing market has continued to decline, according to statistics CNBC cited during the debate. Housing price levels are at 2003 levels, and if this trend continues, in five years, we'll be at 1999 levels, the network said.

"The reason we have the housing crisis we have is that the federal government played to heavy a role in our markets," Romney said. "Barney Frank and Chris Dodd told banks they had to give loans to people who couldn’t afford to pay them back."

Instead of singling out regulators, Texas Gov. Rick Perry simply railed against regulation as a whole.

Bachman complained about the multimillion-dollar "bailouts" that Fannie recently requested after both GSEs handed out multimillion-dollar bonuses to their executives.

"That’s lunacy," Bachman said. "We need to put them … into bankruptcy and get them out of business. They're destroying the housing market."

Write to Justin T. Hilley.

Follow him on Twitter @JustinHilley.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

MBIA Inc. (MBI: 12.04 +0.33%) reported third-quarter income of $444 million, or $2.26 per share, up from a $213 million loss, or $1.06 per share, last year, driven by an unrealized gain of $776 million from insured credit derivatives.

The Armonk, N.Y.-based bond insurer's income also increased from $137 million recorded for the second quarter.

Pre-tax income was $745 million in the third quarter, as the company brought in about $1.12 billion of revenue for the quarter with total expenses at $375 million. Revenue was up from a loss of $191 million for the third quarter of 2010.

For the year through Sept. 30, the loss to common shareholders was $693 million, or $3.50 a share, compared with a loss of $398 million, or $1.96 a share, a year earlier.

"The risk reductions we sought in 2011 have been occurring," President and Chief Financial Officer Chuck Chaplin said. "We have agreed to commute $23 billion of potentially volatile liabilities, primarily CMBS pools and ABS CDOs."

The company estimated commercial mortgage-backed securities losses of $497 million for the third quarter. First-lien residential mortgage-backed securities losses were estimated at $109 million, with second-lien RMBS losses at $134 million.

MBIA is in process of winding down its asset liability management and conduit businesses, and recorded a pretax loss of $9 million in the third quarter from these operations, narrower than a loss of $104 million in the 2010 third quarter.

Total assets for MBIA at Sept. 30 were $29.37 billion, down from $32.28 billion at Dec. 31.

Write to Andrew Scoggin.

Follow him on Twitter @ascoggin.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

Ginnie Mae reported $1.18 billion in net income for the fiscal year 2011, more than double the $541 million the year before.

Ginnie guarantees timely payment of principal of interest on securities backed primarily by Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Affairs loans. The previous earnings high came at $906 million in 2008.

Revenues slightly increased to $1.06 billion.

"Ginnie Mae has had a remarkable year; it’s our best yet," said Ginnie President Ted Tozer. "Our financial performance this fiscal year – despite a mortgage market still in turmoil – is a testament to our well-functioning business model."

Ginnie financed nearly 60% of all home purchases in its fiscal year ended 2011. It guaranteed $1.3 trillion or 4.8 million loans since the crisis struck in 2007. Lawmakers are currently working to restore private capital as the largest financier of U.S. mortgages. Combined with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government backs roughly 95% of all home loans.

But while Fannie and Freddie continue to hemorrhage losses and require bailouts, Ginnie is breaking records.

"Our business is simple, our approach to risk-taking is conservative, and our ability to finance government-insured mortgages is helping to keep the housing market afloat," Tozer said.

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

Combined, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac still hold more than 180,000 homes repossessed through foreclosure, known as REO, despite reductions in the third quarter.

Fannie Mae sold more than 58,000 REO in the third quarter, roughly 13,000 more properties than it acquired, according to its financial filing released Tuesday. It's the lowest total of sales so far this year, 18% below the previous period's total.

Fannie disclosed that it sold the REO at an average price roughly 56% of the unpaid principal balance of the once underlying mortgage.

It currently holds 122,616 previously foreclosed homes with more than half located in eight states: Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio. The 16,700 properties in the Golden State is double any other.

Freddie currently holds roughly 60,000 in REO, according to its third-quarter filing. Despite the recent work to reduce their totals – the 180,000 is down from roughly 196,000 in the second quarter – many of these homes sit vacant and are crippling home price growth around the country.

Freddie is on pace to need 15 years to clear its inventory because it sold only 1,000 more than it took in the first quarter. Fannie would take nearly four years if it continues to clear more than 10,000 more than it acquires every quarter – even though it has double the inventory as Freddie.

Rick Sharga, the executive vice president at Carrington Mortgage Holdings, said the problem is actually worse than the story told by the raw data. Since 2005, there's only been one quarter when the market sold more REO than lenders took in. That occurred in 2009, he said.

Delays from mortgage servicing troubles, including ongoing negotiations with several state attorneys general, new consent orders from regulators and fresh state laws, such as one in Nevada making it a possible felony to robo-sign affidavits, pushed the foreclosure timeline out to a national average of nearly two years.

Once the new rules are put in place, the foreclosures will ramp up again, providing an undistorted look at the foreclosure crisis currently in the shadows. Roughly 1.6 million loans are somewhere in the process, according to CoreLogic (CLGX: 14.56 +0.62%).

"The 'inflection point' of REO sales that suggests the beginnings of a recovery probably won’t happen until 2014. Then it’s just a matter of how quickly the market will be able to absorb all those REOs," Sharga said.

Senators recently urged the Obama administration to accelerate the finalization of a new strategy to unload government-owned REO. Regulators received more than 4,000 responses. The ideas vary. Most are split on whether a large-scale rental program would work. Others are wary of a bulk REO sale program.

Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco has said such a strategy will be deployed at the local level, but Sharga said a national scope is needed.

"The trick is to develop a national program that gets executed on a local market basis, not a program that comes in hundreds (or thousands) or local flavors," Sharga said. "The latter approach is an operational nightmare, difficult to manage from an execution standpoint, probably attractive only to small, local market investors who are already cash constrained, and is unlikely to deliver the kind of stability to the housing market – and return to taxpayers – that a more comprehensive program would."

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

As the nation emerges from the recession, it is widely accepted that housing, as in the past, will be an instrumental part of a meaningful economic recovery.  While opinions may differ on the role of the government and the best approach to meet our current and future needs, we can all agree that the housing finance and delivery systems in place today are in desperate need of repair.

As a co-chair of the new Bipartisan Policy Center Housing Commission, I will work closely with my fellow colleagues and co-chairs— former Senators Kit Bond, George Mitchell and Mel Martinez — over the next year to craft a set of recommendations for how we can begin to address the nation’s struggling housing sector. Together with a slate of experts drawn from housing and related industries, we will focus on developing practical solutions that can be championed by Republicans and Democrats alike.

There is no denying that we face formidable challenges.

A large inventory of vacant foreclosed homes continues to weigh on the market, depressing property values and dampening new construction activity.  Millions of homeowners have fallen behind on their mortgage payments, and millions now owe more than their home is worth.  At the same time, many prospective first-time buyers continue to delay purchasing a home because of concerns about their job security and a lack of confidence in the economy. These trends put pressure on a rental market that, in many places, is already unaffordable to working families.

The interests of the various stakeholders who stand to gain or lose from interventions in the housing sector often do not align, nor do the philosophical views of our lawmakers, making it difficult to build consensus around solutions. Adding another layer of complexity, as the first baby boomers reach retirement age and growing numbers of immigrants call this country home, we face rapid shifts in demand and household composition for which we are ill-prepared.

Notwithstanding these obstacles, it’s clear that a full economic recovery depends on the health of the housing sector. A fully functioning housing market makes it possible for jobseekers to relocate and pursue employment opportunities in other cities and states. Robust residential growth generates jobs for workers in a variety of occupations across the construction, finance and building materials industries, not to mention the indirect employment effects created by this activity.

Common sense suggests, and research has verified, that a stable, affordable home lays the essential groundwork for children to succeed and reach their full potential. And just as having a stable, affordable home is critical to the health and well-being of children and families, sound housing policies are fundamental to the nation’s prosperity and ability to compete in an increasingly global marketplace.

The Bipartisan Policy Center Housing Commission has an opportunity to renew and improve the nation’s housing system, and ensure that our programs and policies align with current and future needs and imperatives. I am confident that the diverse viewpoints of my fellow co-chairs and commissioners will contribute to the development of balanced, innovative and forward-looking solutions that will help to turn around the economic prospects of the nation and enrich the daily life of those who call it home.

Henry Cisneros served as Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development from 1993-1997.  He currently co-chairs the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Housing Commission.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

Miami metro home sales in the third quarter jumped 51% from a year ago, according to the Miami Association of Realtors.

Home sales, including existing single-family homes and condos, totaled 6,412, up from 4,239 last year. Existing condo sales increased 48%, and single-family home sales went up 47%.

Statewide sales for Florida also saw an increase from last year, with single-family homes up 12% and condos up 13%. Nationally, the National Association of Realtors reported home sales fell 0.1% from the second quarter, though they increased 17% from a year earlier.

Miami's home sales have increased 13 consecutive quarters dating back to the third quarter 2008, according to the local realtor association.

"Strong demand from international buyers is fueling robust sales activity in Miami despite low consumer confidence and high unemployment," association chairman Jack Levine said in a Wednesday release. "Local sales are expected to set a record this year that should exceed the height of the boom in 2005."

NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun predicted "double-digit price increase in Miami in 2012," according to the release.

Average sales price in Miami-Dade County for single-family homes was $327,477 in the third quarter, up 19% from a year ago. Average condo sales price increased 21% to $232,158.

Separate reports, however, paint a different pricing picture.

Integrated Asset Services said Tuesday home prices in Miami were up 1.6% in the third quarter from the previous quarter, but down 9.9% from a year ago. Zillow (Z: 26.99 +1.39%) reported Miami housing values sat at $138,200 for the quarter, down 1.1% from the second quarter and 3.5% from the third quarter 2010.

About 47% of homes in Miami were in negative equity, or borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth, according to Zillow.

Write to Andrew Scoggin.

Follow him on Twitter @ascoggin.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

An online auction website is selling $1 billion worth of nonperforming notes on 150 commercial REO properties.

The assets up for bid are located in the Midwest. Starting bids will fall within the $50,000 to $5.4 million-range.

Online bidding begins on Nov. 14 and lasts through Nov. 17. Bidders can go to Auction.com to participate.

"Institutional, regional and local investors are looking for buying opportunities," said Auction.com CEO Jeff Frieden. "The intrinsic nature of auction bidding creates a market for these assets and maximizes results for the seller."

The auction will attempt to offload 48 assets located in Michigan, 38 in Illinois, 30 in Indiana, 25 in Ohio, 10 in Minnesota, 9 in Wisconsin, 3 in Kentucky and two in Missouri.

The non-performing notes and commercial REOs slated for auction include notes on a 115-room Holiday Inn Express located in Riverwood, Ill. Bidding on that note will start at $1.75 million. Two more notes that cover a Chicago office, with a starting bid of $3.2 million, and a Cincinnati retail property, with a beginning bidding price of $1.2 million, also are up for grabs.

REO assets up for sale include an office building, a 204-acre plot of land and a multifamily building unit. Bidding on all three properties will begin above $1 million.

Write to Kerri Panchuk.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

The number of homes sold in the greater Denver area in September rose 19% from a year earlier, with 3,715 houses and condos sold in the eight-county metropolitan area, DataQuick said.

Still, September home sales in the area fell 11.7% from August, reflecting seasonal trends attributable to the start of the school year.

The median sales price for home in the MSA fell slightly in September from August and a year earlier. From Jan. 1 through Sept. 30, the Denver area recorded 31,076 new and resale purchases of homes and condos.

The counties studied in the report include Adams, Arapahoe, Broomfield, Clear Creek, Denver, Douglas, Jefferson and Park counties.

The median price paid for condos in the Denver area hit $210,000 in September, down 2.3% from August and down 3.2% from a year earlier.

Absentee buyers — investors and second-home owners — made up 25.1% of all September home sales. That is up from 22.5% in August, but down from 28.4% last year. Absentee buyers paid a median price of $144,000 for Denver homes in September.

Homebuyers who paid cash made up 26.5% of all September sales, compared to 22.8% in August and 27.9% a year ago.

Government-insured loans from the Federal Housing Administration represented 34.1% of all new Denver area home purchases for the same month.

Write to Kerri Panchuk.

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

A complete legislative framework for a future system for covered bond financing of mortgages made another step Wednesday when a bill was introduced in the Senate.

Meanwhile, European covered bond issuers continue to reap the lion's share of the U.S. dollar-dominated covered bond market in the absence of any solid federal guidance.

Sens. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.), Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) introduced the United States Covered Bond Act of 2011. A House committee passed a similar bill from Reps. Scott Garrett (R-N.J.) and Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.).

The Hagan-Corker bill would create a regulatory and oversight framework for U.S. covered bonds and clarifies the rights of investors in case of an issuer's insolvency. The key difference with Garrett's proposal would change who could issue covered bonds and moves nonbanks to the Federal Reserve's jurisdiction.

Both bills would allow a U.S. covered bond market to pool residential and commercial mortgages into debt securities.

At the end of 2009, the total outstanding volume of covered bonds reached $3.2 trillion and this year foreign banks have issued $32 billion of covered bond to U.S. dollar investors.

Issuers of covered bonds are on the hook against losses. Payment to investors is via swap agreements and are meant to cover the scheduled payments should the issuer become insolvent or there is a discrepancy in timing, where the interest being paid on the loans does not align with payments due to investors. Nonetheless, regulatory insurers of the institutions themselves are concerned about recourse to assets in the case the issuer fails.

A third party trustee represents covered bondholders. Adding these layers of additional recourse, as it compares to securitization, makes it pricier by comparison. Therefore, covered bonds often attract more institutional investors who tend to be huge sticklers for rules.

"The U.S. lags behind its global peers in the development of a covered bond market because we lack a legislative framework for issuers and investors," Hagan said. "With a legislative framework in place, U.S. financial institutions will have a powerful tool that can be used to fund loans to small businesses and households."

Issuers say covered bond legislation is necessary to garner confidence in the investor base. The U.S. Covered Bond Council, an organization under the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, said its members including major banks and pension funds would invest if legislation passes.

Several European countries revised their covered bond regulations to breakdown barriers in order to access the American investor base. This includes easing restrictions on the U.S. dollar-derivative covered bonds.

"Foreign financial institutions have more recently ignited domestic U.S. investor interest through issuance of U.S. dollar denominated covered bonds," Kenneth Bentsen, an executive vice president of SIFMA said Tuesday, as HousingWire reported in February. "U.S. financial institutions have not, however, been able to tap that same investor demand. We believe a dedicated legislative covered bond framework will provide investors with the certainty necessary for a robust covered bond market to develop in the U.S."

While the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. has not come out with either way on a covered bond framework, it has expressed unease.

The House committee denied two amendments introduced by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) that would grant the FDIC powers to establish a covered bond oversight program and veto power for any program submitted by an eligible issuer.

Frank said the FDIC was worried the covered bond program would put the still recovering deposit insurance fund at risk.

"The FDIC has concerns not with the concept but with the extent to which the FDIC will be protected," Frank said during a previous House committee hearing.

Still, investors continue to push on for a developed U.S. covered bond system. BNY Mellon, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs and TIAA-CREF are investors committed to the passage of a Covered Bond Act.

"Covered bonds have demonstrated over a long period of time in Europe that they can play an instrumental role in getting credit flowing to consumers and small businesses, while simultaneously improving the financial stability of the institutions which issue covered bonds," said Ralph Daloisio, managing director of Natixis, an investment firm and member of the American Securitization Forum.

Jacob Gaffney contributed to this report.

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.



Origination/Lending
Consumer sentiment climbed to an index level of 75 in January, the best reading of the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan...

Read More »

Secondary Markets/Investors
The new federal task force led by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sent subpoenas to the 11 largest financial...

Read More »