RSS Twitter

Archive for June, 2011

Friday, June 24th, 2011

A total of 17.2 million home loans will not be eligible for government funding if the conforming loan limit drops in October, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

The maximum limit on mortgages that can be guaranteed or bought by the Federal Housing Administration, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will drop to $625,500 from $729,950. This ceiling varies from county to county. Proponents say allowing the drop will enable private capital to move in and fund more of the jumbo-mortgage market.

But it won't come without a cost. NAHB expects non-conforming mortgages written above the new limit to carry interest rates between 50 and 75 basis points higher.

Roughly 3.6 million owner-occupied homes are currently valued above the conforming loan limits. After the pending changes, another almost 1.4 million homes would be added to that total.

But FHA-insured financing could become even more constricted. According the regulator, 620 counties will lower their FHA loan limit, affecting roughly 44.3 million owner-occupied homes, or 59% of the housing stock in the country.

Currently, 8.3 million homes are priced above the FHA loan limits. After the changes take place in October, another 3.87 million will surpass the limit across the country.

California could feel the brunt of the conforming loan limit cuts as high as $246,750 in some state counties, according to California Association of Realtors. More than 30,000 Californian homeowners will face higher down payments, higher mortgage rates and stricter loan qualification requirements when the limits drop, CAR said.

"The lower limits will place a constraint on home buying in high-cost housing markets, such as those along the coasts and in California. It is the last thing we need in a housing market that is still struggling to get back on its feet," said NAHB Chairman Bob Nielsen, a home builder from Reno, Nev.

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.

Friday, June 24th, 2011

A Republican lawmaker sharply criticized his party colleagues Friday, accusing them of taking an unrealistic approach toward reworking the U.S. mortgage market

The comments by Rep. Gary Miller (R-Calif.) underscored longstanding divisions among Republican lawmakers that have become more public in recent weeks. Several GOP House lawmakers have introduced bills to overhaul government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC), and more are expected.

Top Republicans on the House Financial Services Committee have advanced bills to build a mostly private mortgage-finance system. But Miller and a fellow Californian, Rep. John Campbell, have broken with their leaders and favor approaches with more government support.

Friday, June 24th, 2011

[[Update 1: Adds comment from Wells Fargo]]

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are using tax-exempt status to escape county fees levied during the recording of foreclosure property transfers, two Michigan county leaders said in lawsuits this week.

Andrew Meisner, treasurer of Michigan's Oakland County, and Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson sued Fannie and Freddie in the U.S. District Court on behalf of taxpayers in their county.

Oakland County claims the GSEs owe area taxpayers more than $12 million in unpaid real estate transfer taxes on the sale of foreclosed properties, according to a press release from Meisner. Meisner told HousingWire he believes this is one of the first cases challenging the GSEs' ability to claim exemption from fees on the grounds that they're government agents.

In a statement, Meisner wrote, "Fannie and Freddie you quack like a duck (or a private corporate entity), so you better pay up."

He added, “In this case, Fannie and Freddie walk, fly and quack like private companies, right down to the multimillion-dollar salaries for their CEOs. That means that they are not entitled to exemptions made for government entities.”

The Oakland County plaintiffs contend Fannie and Freddie are not exempt from Michigan's real estate transfer tax, which requires parties transferring properties to pay $1.10 per every $1,000 in value to the counties, while the state receives $7.50 per every $1,000 per transaction.

In the suit, the Oakland County treasurer is trying to reclaim fees tied to 200 real estate transactions that occurred over a period of six years.

In the same state, the Ingham County Register of Deeds Curtis Hertel Jr. filed suit against the two GSEs,  Bank of America (BAC: 7.22 -1.10%), Wells Fargo (WFC: 29.37 +1.10%), Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, and the law firms of Orlans Associates and Trott & Trott P.C.

Hertel claims the defendants tried to escape a transfer tax by moving the assignment of the mortgage. "What you see is literally within one or two months before a foreclosure is filed, they transfer assignment of the mortgage to Fannie and Freddie," Hertel said. "Why would they do that right before the foreclosure is about to happen … obviously it is to avoid fees."

Spokespersons for Fannie and Freddie declined to comment on the cases. Wells Fargo released a statement saying, "Wells Fargo has not been served in a lawsuit by the Register of Deeds in Ingham County, Michigan. It is our policy to comply with all applicable laws and we contend that we do so."

The remaining defendants either declined to comment on pending litigation or could not be reached.

Hertel said he does not believe the GSEs are exempt from paying the fees. "The crux of my suit is that they are not exempt," Hertel said. "You have to be an agent of the federal government to be exempt. I do not believe they qualify for that."

Write to Kerri Panchuk.



Friday, June 24th, 2011

The Justice Department requested former Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Chairman Lee Farkas receive a sentence of the maximum 385 years in prison for orchestrating the $2.9 billion fraud scheme that lasted from 2002 to August 2009.

The DOJ filed a memo with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Thursday requesting the term. A sentencing hearing for Farkas is scheduled for June 30.

Farkas and six other co-conspirators spent the better part of the last decade sweeping funds and covering overdrafts between TBW and the facilities at Colonial Bank and Ocala Funding. All three companies failed in 2009.

TBW, based in Ocala, Fla., originated, serviced and sold mortgages to Freddie Mac and relied on Colonial and the TBW subsidiary Ocala Funding to finance the loans.

But some of these mortgages didn't exist and previously foreclosed homes and nonexistent loans served as collateral in some securities, according to court documents. Farkas and the co-conspirators falsified documents to show TBW was selling the loans, and they used these phantom proceeds to cover financial "holes" in TBW accounts at Colonial. The Special Inspector General of the Troubled Asset Relief Program discovered the fraud when Farkas filed a false application with TARP officials on behalf of Colonial for a $553 million bailout in 2009.

The co-conspirators all plead guilty in April and testified against Farkas. He was found guilty after a 10-day trial of 14 counts of bank, wire fraud and filing false statements with the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The court also found Farkas took more than $40 million from TBW and Colonial to fund his chain of restaurants and make extravagant purchases of homes and even a helicopter.

"A very lengthy sentence, particularly one at the statutory maximum sentence of 385 years, will certainly draw the attention of corporate executives and will provide necessary and substantial general deterrence," according to the DOJ memo.

As for the co-conspirators, they will serve significantly less time in prison.

Paul Allen, former chief executive of TBW and head of Ocala, was sentenced to 40 months. TBW Treasurer Desiree Brown was sentenced to 72 months and former TBW President Raymond Bowman faces 30 months in prison.

Colonial Vice President Catherine Kissick, who ran the facility that funded TBW loans, was sentenced to eight years. The Colonial facility's former operations supervisor was sentenced to three months in prison.

Justice Department attorneys showed in court the co-conspirators took little to no money for themselves, aside from the occasional loan from Farkas they did not have to pay back. Instead, the prosecution showed Farkas time and again manipulated the others to keep the scheme going when they threatened to go to regulators or law enforcement.

"If you make good on your threats, the meltdown will surely be unpleasant," Farkas wrote to Kissick in an email, according to court documents.

"As the court has noted at each of the sentencings in this case thus far, Farkas’ co- conspirators are generally decent people who made terrible decisions and failed to extricate themselves from a fraud scheme spiraling out of control," according to the DOJ memo. "Farkas can hardly be included in this category. For years, he manipulated his co-conspirators and others to his personal advantage."

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.

Friday, June 24th, 2011

The ranks of apartment dwellers have grown as homebuyers lose homes to foreclosure, according to property managers.

TransUnion surveyed more than 1,100 property managers across the country in early June to identify trends in the rental space. The credit reporting agency polled about 1,000 small property managers with 200 units or less and 167 large property managers with more than 200 units.

According to the survey, 47% of all property managers reported an increase in rental applicants moving into apartments from foreclosed properties. Sequentially, more than two-third of managers said it is not difficult to find residents in today's economy even with increases in rent.

"Finding reliable tenants at an optimal price point is paramount for this industry," said Mike Mauseth, vice president in TransUnion's rental screening business unit. "Both segments saw success with rental increases last year."

About 64% of large property managers said rental prices on their units increased from last year, as did 36% of small property managers. Still, 57% of large property managers have no difficulty finding applicants, alongside 69% of small property managers.

Finding qualified renters, however, is another issue. When asked to compare conditions to a year ago, 27% of managers with more than 200 properties said it was more difficult to find qualified renters, while only 18% of small property managers held this same opinion.

"A reliable tenant ensures property managers are both solvent and profitable," commented Mauseth. "Conversely an unreliable tenant can cost property managers thousands of dollars in lost rent and property damages."

Some 87% of managers reportedly run credit checks on prospective tenants and 76% of managers run a criminal background check, according to TransUnion. More than 89% of all survey respondents had vacancy rates of 10% or less.

Write to Christine Ricciardi.

Friday, June 24th, 2011

Fitch Ratings in July will tighten its ratings methodology for commercial mortgages pooled into securities for the secondary market.

Among the changes, it is anticipated Fitch analysts will apply an increased probability of loss on debt with higher loan-to-value ratios.

The stricter risk ratings will only be applied to so-called CMBS 2.0, transactions issued after 2008. Critics argue the CMBS market is relatively active compared to private-label residential mortgage-backed securities, yet underwriting standards on CMBS 2.0 is slipping as more competition enters the space and deal flow continues to grow.

The changes are also applicable only to transactions with several borrowers involved.

Fitch is seeking to offer more transparency in its ratings methodology, the agency said. A report accompanying the changes also will provide more clarity on the decision.

Macroeconomic conditions will play a larger role in ratings, as will property level cash flows. For example, Fitch will begin to measure the impact of CMBS structures that feature the removal of credit for springing lockboxes. Lockboxes are a capital management tool and, in this case, capital "springs open" in the event of a default.

CMBS rated before 2009 will not be impacted by the changes.

Write to Jacob Gaffney.

Follow him on Twitter @jacobgaffney.

Friday, June 24th, 2011

Critics who claim the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau lacks a balanced and constitutional structure may find a powerful ally in David Stevens, president and chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Stevens sent a letter to lawmakers this week, saying while the MBA has "consistently supported the (Dodd-Frank) legislation's underlying goal of putting disparate consumer financial regulatory functions under one roof," the MBA chief is backing the Financial Services Appropriations Act of fiscal 2012, which would increase financial and regulatory oversight of the CFPB.

The House Appropriations Committee voted Thursday to cap funding for the CFPB. The committee passed funding proposals for the Treasury Department, Securities and Exchange Commission and other federal agencies. The bill accepted by the committee stipulated the CFPB cannot receive more than $200 million from the Federal Reserve in fiscal 2012 for operational funding. The Fed estimates the CFPB's operating expenses at $500 million.

The Stevens letter supporting appropriations oversight is addressed to ranking members of the House Committee on Appropriations.

Stevens did not bash the CFPB in his letter and he supports aspects of the financial reform.

"The creation of the CFPB, while achieving that goal, did so at the expense of assuring sufficient oversight and appropriate governance of this new and immensely powerful regulatory entity," Stevens wrote.

Stevens said the current structure of the bureau would allow the CFPB to receive its funding directly from the Federal Reserve, removing any type of legislative oversight.

"The appropriations bill would correct this flaw by subjecting CFPB to the regular congressional appropriations process, effective in fiscal year 2013," he wrote in the letter. "It is notable that the legislation does not limit funding for the CFPB (authorizing 'such sums as may be necessary'), but merely places these important budgetary decisions in the hands of Congress, where they belong."

Write to Kerri Panchuk.

Friday, June 24th, 2011

The Treasury Department signaled Friday regulators might draw back on the risk-retention proposal in search of common ground with industry and consumer groups.

Federal regulators proposed the risk-retention rule in April, requiring lenders to maintain 5% of the credit risk on loans, including mortgages, pooled into securities. Lenders do not have to maintain the risk on qualified residential mortgages, which include a strict debt-to-income ratio, servicing standards and a 20% down payment.

On Thursday, a coalition of 44 groups representing both mortgage bankers, insurers and consumers met on Capitol Hill with the lawmakers who drafted the rule mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act. The coalition criticized what members called overly restrictive guidelines on the QRM, specifically the 20% down payment.

"Our goal is to strike a balance that preserves access to affordable mortgage credit in all communities for creditworthy borrowers across incomes, while strengthening the long-term health of the housing market and our economy. We believe that risk retention, as part of comprehensive housing finance reform, is an important part of that effort," said Treasury Under Secretary Jeffrey Goldstein in a speech before the National Housing Conference Friday.

A slew of research came out since the rule proposal. One report showed half of borrowers could be shut out of buying a home because of the down payment. Another warned of the risk blocking new refinancing because of debt-to-income ratio requirements. More than 300 lawmakers in both the Senate and the House of Representatives signed letters asking regulators to revise the rule.

But rule makers, including Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair, long argued the QRM was designed to be just a small slice of the market. Research from credit ratings agency DBRS showed prime mortgages originated in 2011 already mirror the requirements.

Still, Goldstein said regulators are paying close attention to the push back.

"We are seriously considering feedback and are committed to getting this rule right, so that we can ensure securitization is a stable and reliable source of credit for consumers, businesses, and homeowners," Goldstein said.

Regulators, including the Treasury, recently extended the comment period for the rule to Aug. 1 from June 10.

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.

Friday, June 24th, 2011

A default servicing subsidiary connected to DJSP Enterprises and former Florida foreclosure attorney David J. Stern signed an acquisition agreement, according to a regulatory filing.

Default Servicing LLC will be sold to Default Servicing USA Inc., a unit of Arlington, Va.-based Homeland Security Capital Corp., according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Default Servicing LLC provides real estate-owned liquidation services directly to REO customers, including property inspection, valuation, eviction, broker assignments, closing and other services.

The Homeland subsidiary, based in Louisville, Ky., will pay $500,000 cash for the company and up to $3.25 million as a percentage of revenue through 2014, according to the regulatory filing.

DJSP was the back-office processing firm of Stern. DJSP voluntarily delisted from Nasdaq in March in after failing to to meet the minimum trading requirements of $1 per share in December. On Friday, it was trading at 8 cents a share over the counter.

The problems of the Law Offices of David J. Stern began when four large Florida default services law firms became the target of then Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum for alleged sloppy foreclosure practices last fall. The investigation has since been expanded to include other firms under current AG Pam Bondi.

By October and November, some of the nation's largest servicers, along with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, began began pulling their foreclosure cases from Stern's law firm.

The rapid downfall came amid a national scandal in the mortgage servicing sector, dubbed robo-signing, where employees at foreclosure law firms were accused of signing foreclosure affidavits and other legal documents with no knowledge of the validity of the claims in the documents. Since the fall, the firm's employee count slid to just a half dozen attorneys and no support staff as of mid-May from some 1,400 previously.

Stern ceased foreclosure work at the end of March.

Now Stern is fighting back against former clients whose business once elevated him to one of the richest and most well-known default services lawyers in the country.

The fight is taking place largely in state and federal courtrooms via 25 lawsuits, in which Stern alleges the biggest names in the mortgage industry owe him more than $34 million in unpaid invoices.

Write to Kerry Curry.

Follow her on Twitter @communicatorKLC.

Friday, June 24th, 2011

Freddie Mac's mortgage portfolio decreased at an annual rate of 3.5% in May as government officials continue to discuss how to transition to a mortgage market dominated by private capital.

The GSE's single-family refinance-loan purchase and guarantee volume hit $13.3 billion in May, representing 58% of total mortgage purchases and issuances, Freddie Mac said in its monthly volume update. Volume was $16.6 billion in April, 70% of all mortgage purchases and issuances.

During the same period, Freddie's mortgage-related securities and guarantee commitments fell at an annualized rate of 2.4%.

In May, the GSE modified 8,891 loans, down from more than 11,000 modifications in April. When analyzing the five-month period ending in May, Freddie completed 55,398 loan mods.

Meanwhile, the single-family seriously delinquent rate at Freddie fell to 3.53% in May, compared to 4.06% in May 2010. Multifamily delinquency rate declined to 0.38% from 0.4% in April, but was up from the 0.29% recorded in May 2010.

Write to Kerri Panchuk.



Origination/Lending
Consumer sentiment climbed to an index level of 75 in January, the best reading of the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan...

Read More »

Secondary Markets/Investors
The new federal task force led by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sent subpoenas to the 11 largest financial...

Read More »