RSS Twitter

Archive for May, 2011

Friday, May 20th, 2011

An easy tweak to pooling and servicing agreements would allow short sales on defaulted mortgage notes in mortgage-backed securities trusts, according to a white paper distributed by American Home Mortgage Servicing.

Short sales from MBS issues is the key to unlocking principal reduction modifications, according to the paper.

Jordan Dorchuck, executive vice president and chief legal officer of the Texas-based mortgage servicing firm, said many PSAs prohibit servicers from selling loans out of trusts prior to liquidation through foreclosure. Dorchuck wrote the white paper with Jim Lockhart, vice chairman of WL Ross & Co., and Pete Mills, managing director of Mortgage Banking Initiatives Inc.

The PSAs don't authorize these distressed mortgage loan sales because loss of accounting sale treatment would have resulted in potentially financially costly results for the securitization sponsors, but a change in accounting rules last year no longer constrains servicers from selling distressed notes out of securitization trusts, the paper says.

The authors said the Treasury Department and home loan industry need to consider principal reductions and increase the number of short sales on defaulted loans within MBS to lessen foreclosures and reinvigorate the market.

Short sales "provide an additional tool to offer deeply distressed borrowers a last chance to avoid foreclosure."

The authors said millions of homeowners with loans that have been bundled as collateral for private-label, residential mortgage-backed securities aren't able to get a modification for various reasons.

Many borrowers don't qualify for the federal government's Home Affordable Modification Program or similar program because it would require a steep principal reduction that would result in the mod stressing or failing the net-present-value test.

Also, a lot of contracts governing MBS include caps on the number of loans eligible for modification, prohibit certain loan mod options such as principal reduction, as well as banning the sale of notes from trusts, according to the authors.

While there are a substantial number of homeowners underwater on their mortgage — where they owe more than the property is worth — servicers are reluctant "to reduce principal for fear of investor dissatisfaction and out of concern for moral hazard."

Dorchuck, Lockhart and Mills also said the massive volume of distressed properties interferes with servicers' ability modify loans.

"Removing these loans from securitization trusts at NPV positive prices, and allowing private sector distressed asset purchasers to compete for and acquire the loans, should provide a material benefit to borrowers by giving them the one last clear chance that HAMP was intended to provide, but appears unable to deliver to many homeowners," they said.

"From the MBS investor perspective, market prices of their securities already reflect large foreclosure losses. Short sales of mortgage loans should reduce those expected losses and achieve 'finality,' quickly. Hundreds of thousands of homeowners could potentially be helped with affordable loan modifications if they included responsible principal reduction components," the paper said.

The plan assumes that large bank servicers, which service approximately 60% to 70% of all outstanding residential mortgage loans, would look with favor on a plan allowing the sale of blocks of distressed loans out of MBS trusts. They'd get rid of their servicing responsibilities on those notes. After the sale, smaller, default management-oriented special servicers would be engaged by the new owners to handle these borrowers and assets, according to the white paper.

There are roughly 4 million residential mortgages in some stage of default or already foreclosed on. Dorchuck and his co-authors cite a report from Amherst Securities in early October that states another 5 million to 7 million borrowers may enter the foreclosure process before the end of 2012.

Meanwhile, servicers have modified about 634,000 loans for borrowers via HAMP and another 1.5 million received non-HAMP modifications through February.

"Without changes, the volume of foreclosures will continue to outpace the number of loan modifications," Dorchuck, Lockhart and Mills wrote in the white paper.

Write to Jason Philyaw.

Friday, May 20th, 2011

Moody's Investors Service (MCO: 37.77 -0.76%) downgraded ratings on 17 tranches of mortgage-backed securities within seven "scratch and dent" deals as collateral backing the underlying Countrywide Financial Corp. loans continued to deteriorate.

Analysts also confirmed the rating of one tranche included in the $196 million worth of RMBS issued by Countrywide Home Loan Trust 2003-SD2. Many of the tranches were initially rated triple-A and now carry ratings in the junk status.

Scratch and dent deals are those outside the standard categories of RMBS: prime, jumbo, subprime, option adjustable-rate mortgages and Alt-A.

The impacted deals are backed by first-lien, fixed and adjustable rate scratch and dent home mortgages. Moody's has been adjusting ratings on numerous RMBS deals all year after revising the criteria for these securities issued before 2005. Analysts said the loans may have been originated outside a lender's guidelines or in arrears.

"These pools may also include loans with document defects at origination that were since rectified," analysts said. "Due to the varied content of scratch and dent mortgage pools, which can range from seasoned prime-like loans to non-prime loans that were seriously delinquent at the time of securitization, credit quality of these pools varies considerably."

Write to: Kerri Panchuk.

Friday, May 20th, 2011

A grand jury in San Jose, Calif., indicted six defendants in a $40 million mortgage scheme this week.

The alleged perpetrators profited from arranging and selling mortgages for high-end homes to low-income families who were always at risk of default.

The grand jury indicted Norma Valdovinos, Claudia Valdovinos, Linda Dung Tran, Elaine Ly and Pablo Curiel, of San Jose, as well as Jesus Chavez, of Gilroy, Calif., according to the Federal Bureau of Investigations office in San Francisco. The 32-count indictment brings the total number of defendants tied to the mortgage fraud scheme to 10. Last year, four other defendants were indicted in connection to this case.

The FBI said the accused induced banks to lend $40 million to borrowers who were not qualified for the mortgages. In addition, authorities claim the defendants profited from the scheme, receiving more than $1 million in commissions.

The FBI alleges Norma Valdovinos and Chavez used their roles as real estate agents for Century 21 Golden Hills Real Estate to solicit low-income homebuyers to purchase homes valued at more than $500,000.

Those clients were then referred to Linda Tran, who owned Palacio Mortgage. Tran inflated and misrepresented the loan applicants' income, assets and employment information, so they could acquire the loans, the FBI alleges. Tran was assisted by Ly and Claudia Valdovinos in falsifying information on the standard Uniform Residential Loan Applications.

Curiel provided funds for the down payments without the banks knowledge.

All of the defendants face charges of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, bank fraud and making a false statement to a bank. Norma Valdovinos and Tran also were charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering and money laundering.

Write to: Kerri Panchuk.

Friday, May 20th, 2011

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency met with the 14 mortgage servicers Friday over details in the recently signed consent orders, sources familiar with the matter confirmed.

The orders are meant to settle recent foreclosure investigations. According to the orders, servicers must retain an independent firm to review foreclosure actions pending between Jan. 1, 2009 and Dec. 31, 2010. The review will be conducted to determine any financial injury to borrowers caused by the errors, misrepresentations or other deficiencies.

Mortgage servicers, HousingWire is informed, are raising questions about the way in which the independent reviews are implemented.

The OCC and the Fed already conducted a review of 2,800 files between these dates, but servicers are also reportedly now asking about the sampling size for these reviews.

The independent reviews, however, will not be made public as HousingWire reported last week. But Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said regulators must be diligent on what auditing firms are allowed to conduct the reviews.

The nation's four largest servicers Bank of America (BAC: 7.219 -1.11%), Wells Fargo (WFC: 29.3475 +1.02%), JPMorgan Chase (JPM: 37.259 -0.62%) and Citigroup (C: 30.415 +0.12%) declined to comment, citing regulatory restrictions against disclosure.

Meanwhile, the regulators are working to establish a national mortgage servicing standard built upon the requirements in the consent orders, Acting Comptroller of the Currency John Walsh said in a speech Thursday.

"The standards we’re looking at would apply to almost every aspect of the business," Walsh said. "They would govern the handling and crediting of borrower payments, ensure that borrowers receive full and accurate information about their accounts, and require servicers to respond promptly to borrower questions or complaints, among other things."

Walsh did question the timing of the reams of new regulations for the mortgage industry. There are 15 to 20 new mortgage lending and servicing requirements coming down the pipeline from Dodd-Frank Act alone in what Walsh called "more tsunami than simple wave."

"I believe comprehensive mortgage servicing standards are necessary, and that the standards proposed by the OCC all make good sense," Walsh said. "But they will change the servicing business in important ways, and it may be that some providers will decide that the high-volume, low-margin, technology-dependent model no longer works financially. If major players scale down or leave the business, how will that affect the mortgage markets and access to homeownership?"

Kerri Panchuck contributed to this report.

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.

Friday, May 20th, 2011

William Dudley, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, reiterated two well-known themes while speaking to the Dutchess County Regional Chamber of Commerce this week: Oil and housing remain risks to the economic recovery.

While the economy has expanded somewhat since the recession ended in mid-2009, economic growth in first quarter increased at a modest annual rate of 1.8%, lower than previously expected, Dudley said, while speaking to the chamber, which covers an area in the Hudson Valley between Albany and New York City.

A continued decline in housing prices combined with high oil and commodity prices are reducing the purchasing power of American families further constraining economic growth, Dudley said.

"The renewed decline in home prices could dampen consumer spending and housing activity more than I expect," he said.

His views echo earlier reports that showed first-quarter growth at a slower-than-expected pace, as higher food and gas prices stoked inflationary fears. Dudley's forecast suggests the same waiting game on these two issues is continuing across America.

On a more optimistic note, Dudley noted an uptick in the growth of manufacturing jobs.

"While the exact pace of a jobs market recovery is always hard to predict, we were expecting the rate of job growth to pick up over the first half, and I am hopeful that job growth will continue to strengthen in the coming months," he said. "However, even if the economy added 300,000 jobs per month from now on, we would likely still have considerable labor market slack at the end of 2012."

Write to: Kerri Panchuk.

Friday, May 20th, 2011

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. executives expect to receive subpoenas soon from U.S. prosecutors seeking more information about the securities firm's mortgage-related business, according to people familiar with the situation.

Officials at the New York company believe the Justice Department will demand certain documents and other information, possibly within days, these people said. Spokesmen for Goldman and the Justice Department declined to comment Thursday.

Friday, May 20th, 2011

There will be a “waterfall” of credit-rating cuts in the $2.93 trillion municipal debt market as ratings companies scrutinize state and local off-balance sheet liabilities, said Meredith Whitney, the banking analyst.

The downgrades will force investors such as insurance companies to sell the securities, presenting an opportunity for other bond buyers, Whitney said on a radio interview today on “Bloomberg Surveillance” with Tom Keene. The analyst fueled a sell-off of tax-exempt debt when she said on CBS Corp.'s “60 Minutes” in December that there could be 50 to 100 “sizable” municipal-bond defaults in 2011 amounting to “hundreds of billions of dollars.”

Friday, May 20th, 2011

The credit crisis pulled the shadow banking system into the light, creating a new era of transparency that could stave off future financial meltdowns, Standard & Poor's analysts concluded in a new report.

The shadow banking system — otherwise known as the financial system that operates outside the world of regulated depositories, investment banks or bond funds — could be positioned to take a greater role in lending, according to Standard & Poor's.

A run on the shadow banking system knocked many of the players out of the game during the economic downturn, leaving a few bit players who still could have a place in lending, analysts said. Bbringing this system into the light will create more transparency, which in turn could lead to a safer banking system, according to S&P.

"In our view, shadow-banking players differ from traditional banks in three important ways," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Nik Khakee. "They don't typically operate under bank regulatory supervision and thus often operate under differing capital, leverage, and liquidity guidelines.

"They don't normally benefit from government capital support, such as deposit insurance. And they don't benefit from the liquidity support available to regulated banks, such as the ability to borrow from the Fed," Khakee said.

Write to: Kerri Panchuk.

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

Las Vegas home sales in April were essentially flat over April 2010 with just a 0.4% uptick, while prices slumped 13% as foreclosures continued to dominate the market, according to DataQuick.

About 4,500 new and resale homes and condos sold in the Las Vegas metropolitan area last month, down 9.5% from March.

The median price paid for all new and resale houses and condos sold was $116,500, sliding 13% from a year earlier and down 0.4% from March. It was the seventh consecutive month in which the median price fell year-over-year, and the magnitude of the decline was the highest in since the median fell 17.2% year-over-year in February 2010.

Still, sales hit a five-year high in April, as investors and cash buyers flocked to the distressed market.

DataQuick attributed the slight growth in sales to an influx of cash-only purchases. In April, 54.1% of sales transactions involved cash buyers, up slightly from 54% in March and up from 47.6% a year earlier.

Cash buyers paid a median $90,000 for a home last month, according to the San Diego-based research firm.

Prices are continually trending downward due to the amount of distressed sales every month. DataQuick said about 62% of all market sales in Las Vegas were attributable to distressed properties in April. This sector also made up 68% of the resale market.

DataQuick reported a slight rise in the number of foreclosed properties in April. Lenders foreclosed on 3,682 single-family homes and condos during the month, up 8.9% from February and up 11.2% from April 2010.

Write to Christine Ricciardi.

Follow her on Twitter @HWnewbieCR.

Thursday, May 19th, 2011

A California appellate court reversed a 2010 state court decision that dismissed claims against Countrywide Financial Corp. on the grounds of a jurisdiction dispute. The ruling allows the case to proceed in state court.

Investor David Luther, a number of pension funds and other institutions sued Countrywide alleging the lender issued mortgage-backed securities between 2005 and 2007 with false and misleading statements as stipulated under the federal Securities Act of 1933.

The act was designed to provide investors with full disclosure of material information concerning these offerings. But Countrywide argued the state court had no jurisdiction under the law. The argument was sustained and the case was dismissed in 2010.

But on appeal, Emilie Elias, an appellate judge in California, found the lower trial court misinterpreted the act, ruled the investors had the ability to file a class action in state court and allowed the class action to proceed on the state level.

Securities law firm Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check is co-lead counsel for the investors and expects the court of appeals to send the case back to Los Angeles County Superior Court to proceed with the litigation.

Write to Jon Prior.

Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.



Origination/Lending
Consumer sentiment climbed to an index level of 75 in January, the best reading of the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan...

Read More »

Secondary Markets/Investors
The new federal task force led by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sent subpoenas to the 11 largest financial...

Read More »