Archive for April, 2011
Bank of America (BAC: 7.212 -1.21%) earned $2 billion in the first quarter, or 17 cents a share, as it settled more mortgage buyback claims and shook up its executive management team.
BofA earnings for the quarter dropped 37% from one year ago but increased from a $1.2 billion loss in the fourth quarter. The bank settled representation and warranty claims on troubled residential mortgage-backed securities with monoline insurer Assured Guaranty for $1.6 billion. The remaining principal balance on these severely delinquent loans totaled $10.9 billion.
The settlement covered 21 first-lien RMBS trusts and eight second-lien trusts. In January, the bank settled RMBS buyback claims from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for roughly $3 billion. BofA set aside an additional $1 billion in reps and warranties provisions during the first quarter, down from $4.1 billion at the end of 2010.
"This agreement is an important step towards resolving non-government sponsored enterprise legacy issues on terms beneficial to our company," said Terry Laughlin, Legacy Asset Servicing executive.
Not all was settled in mortgage servicing however. The government-sponsored enterprises charged BofA $548 million in fees in the first quarter for recent foreclosure delays.
As part of a series of announcements Friday, BofA Chief Financial Officer Chuck Noski will become the bank's vice chairman. Bruce Thompson will replace him as the CFO, and Gary Lynch moved into a new position as the bank's global chief of legal, compliance and regulatory relations. The transitions are expected to take place over the next several months as the bank attempts to evolve from a U.S.-based commercial bank into a global financial services company.
Total revenue at the bank dropped 19% to $27 billion in the first quarter from $32 billion one year ago. Reps and warranties claims, lower mortgage production and the GSE servicing fees drove the downturn, the bank said. Personnel costs increased $1 billion during the quarter, as it took on more staff for its mortgage servicing business, a requirement of its recent consent order with regulators.
However, because of a downturn in homeownership demand, 1,500 employees were laid off from its forward mortgage unit, Moynihan said in a conference call with investors Friday.
Litigation expenses overall at the bank increased to $940 million in the first quarter, mostly related to its mortgage department.
As BofA continues to work through its mortgage issues, CEO Brian Moynihan maintained that the business and the overall economy is on the mend.
"While still soft, the economy is healing; we see retail spending up versus the year-ago period and continued declines in bankruptcy filings and delinquency rates," Moynihan said.
Write to Jon Prior.
Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.
Tags: Bank of America, Fannie Mae, freddie mac, mortgage, regulators, reps and warranties, Servicing/Default
Posted in Secondary Market/Investors, Slider, Top Stories | 6 Comments »
John Walsh, the Comptroller of the Currency, said his office and the Federal Reserve needed to move quickly to fix a broken mortgage servicing system. Therefore, they could not wait for the 50 state attorneys general to finalize their own solution.
On Wednesday, the OCC and the Fed announced consent orders signed by 14 mortgage servicers requiring these companies to fix mishandled foreclosures. In 2010, employees were found to be signing affidavits improperly and in some cases illegally. Distressed borrowers thinking they were near a modification were foreclosed on, and communication lines between homeowners and their servicer were flooded and overwhelmed.
The servicers have 60 days to give their plans to the regulators, even as they negotiate a separate settlement with other agencies and the 50 state attorneys general. Walsh said the problem found from their investigation was serious, and that the servicers have to do "substantial work and absorb substantial expense to fix." But many said the settlement the OCC and the Fed struck undermines the AGs, even though Miller denied the claims.
"The simple answer is that we all have our jobs to do and, while we fully supported the goal of reaching simultaneous conclusions to our various enforcement actions, having established the scope of problems in our area of jurisdiction, the bank regulators had to move forward," Walsh said. "To delay further could expose additional borrowers to harm, and leave the safety and soundness of the banks unaddressed. Our job as supervisors is to fix what is broken, and compensate those who are harmed, and that’s what our enforcement actions will do."
Walsh added that the only reassurance from his investigation was that borrowers in these foreclosures were seriously delinquent. More than 90% of the borrowers who received a foreclosure in 2010 hadn't made a mortgage payment in six months, he said in a speech Thursday before the trade group Women in Housing Finance.
"[A]s we take steps to solve the processing problem and ensure that troubled borrowers receive the full protections available under federal and state laws, our actions are unlikely to fundamentally change the trajectory of the foreclosure problem," Walsh said.
RealtyTrac reported Thursday morning that foreclosures dropped 27% during the first quarter of 2011. But that was because of the pause in the process as these companies worked to correct their issues. But Walsh said the breakdown in the foreclosure process did not cause the housing crisis and the settlement struck between servicers and his office will not halt the rising levels of foreclosures.
Walsh said the affidavit problems, which have garnered the most provocative images of the scandal was not the only issue. Breakdowns occurred at almost every turn, Walsh said.
"Robo-signing may be the image that has lodged most firmly in our minds from news reports, but other deficiencies, beyond the mishandling of affidavits, were equally serious," Walsh said. "That such routine business operations could be so badly mismanaged as to raise safety and soundness concerns was, quite frankly, astounding."
Write to Jon Prior.
Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.
Tags: affidavits, AG, Federal Reserve, foreclosure, mortgage, OCC, regulators, servicers, Walsh
Posted in Servicing/Default, Slider, Top Stories | 3 Comments »
U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) introduced a bill into the Senate Thursday to extend foreclosure mitigation services and decrease fraud in the mortgage servicing space.
The Foreclosure Fraud and Homeowner Abuse Prevention Act of 2011 would protect homeowners from servicer errors, miscommunication and abusive fees; end the rush to foreclosure and require servicers to work with homeowners to achieve sustainable mortgages; and improve standards for staffing and casework by mortgage servicers.
The bill also accommodates investors by offering extra protection of the interests of those investing in mortgage-backed securities and reforming the oversight that governs pools of securitized mortgages.
"It is clear that the current system isn’t working and unfortunately federal regulators have failed to bring meaningful reform to the mortgaging servicing," Brown said. "We should be finding ways to keep people in their homes, not gouging homeowners and forcing more houses onto an already depressed housing market."
Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.) sponsored and introduced the Senate bill's counterpart in the House. He believes the bill will help lead to more sustainable modifications of mortgages with principal reductions in order to help families keep their homes and avoid foreclosure.
"The widespread mistakes, abuses and outright fraud by mortgage servicers must be addressed so we can get a grip on our housing market to try to stabilize it," Miller said.
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) introduced a House bill Wednesday that also pushes for more loss mitigation requirements, including modifications and borrower disclosures before servicers file a case. The Senate companion bill was introduced by Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.).
A piece of the federal budget that was designated to facilitate loss mitigation efforts such as foreclosure counseling was cut last week under a Democrat and Republican compromise. In total, $88 million in funding was eliminated for these efforts.
Write to Christine Ricciardi.
Follow her on Twitter @HWnewbieCR.
Tags: Foreclosure Fraud and Homeowner Abuse Prevention Act of 2011, House of Representatives, Rep. Brad Miller, Rep. Elijah Cummings, Sen. Jack Reed, Sen. Sherrod Brown, Senate
Posted in Servicing/Default, Top Stories | 2 Comments »
Lawmakers in the House of Representatives are considering a push to lower the 20% down payment required for exemption of the recently proposed risk-retention rules on securitized mortgages.
The House capital markets subcommittee held a hearing Thursday on the risk-retention rule proposed in March and its unintended consequences. The rule, approved by federal regulators, would require lenders to maintain 5% of the risk on mortgages pooled into securities. An exemption was also established. Any qualified-residential mortgage that has, among other requirements, 20% down would be exempt from risk retention.
Critics of the rule claim the 20% down is too high, and that lenders wanting to avoid holding onto the risk would price out low- to middle-income borrowers and further constrict demand for an already struggling housing market.
"I disagree that all residential mortgage loans will have to fall under the QRM. Risk retention is not meant to stop securitization. It's meant to make it more responsible," said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.). "But there are arguments that 20% is too high of a number, and I'm willing to work with others on that."
The feeling was nearly unanimous among those on the subcommittee. Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.) said the rule is contrary to the Treasury Department's recent recommendation to redesign the mortgage finance market and bring in more private capital to the market.
"There are aspects of the rule that raise questions," Bachus said.
The new acting director of the Federal Housing Administration, Bob Ryan, who was previously its chief risk officer, testified Thursday that an alternative definition for the QRM allows regulators to consider a 10% down payment instead.
"We are concerned by the 20%. It may be too high. We are seeking feed back on the performance benefits of lowering it," Ryan said.
Several trade and consumer advocacy groups wrote a letter to regulators this week asking for revisions to standards on the QRM to not lockout credit-worthy borrowers.
"I fear it does not serve as a caution light but perhaps as an absolute stop sign," said Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas). "Any time you get the mortgage bankers, the mortgage insurers, the Center for Responsible Lending and Congressional Black Caucus to agree on something, maybe this committee should pay a little bit of attention."
However, regulators at the hearing, including Michael Krimminger, general counsel for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., said not all homebuyers will have to meet the higher QRM standards.
"On the contrary, we anticipate that loans meeting the QRM exemption will be a small slice of the market, with greater flexibility provided for loans securitized with risk retention or held in portfolio," Krimminger said.
Federal Housing Finance Agency Chief Economist Patrick Lawler said lowering the QRM down payment to 10% would increase the share qualifying GSE loans in the market to 32% from 27%. He said these loans, however, would be much riskier. The 90-day delinquency rate on a loan with 10% down is consistently twice as high, Lawler said.
"Concerns have been raised about the impact this standard would have on the availability or cost of finance for homebuyers who are unable to put down 20% of the purchase price," Lawler told the subcommittee.
Kevin Schneider, CEO, of the mortgage insurer Genworth Financial (GNW: 7.79 -0.13%) testified that many Americans would have to save up for more than a decade before being able to afford the 20% down payment. At a typical savings rate, he said, a family earning $50,000 per year would need 11 years to save up that down payment on a median-priced home of $153,000.
Henry Cunningham, board member of the Mortgage Bankers Association, said if the current proposal is put into effect, millions of consumers would either put off buying or home or pay "unnecessarily high rates."
"In the midst of a very fragile housing recovery, the government is throwing a devastating, unnecessary and very expensive wrench into the American dream," Cunningham said.
Write to Jon Prior.
Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.
Tags: Bachus, Barney Frank, Center for Responsible Lending, Congressional Black Caucus, FDIC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., FHA, FHFA, GSE, MBA, mortgage, QRM, risk retention, Treasury Department
Posted in Secondary Market/Investors, Top Stories | 8 Comments »
Mortgage origination technology firm Ellie Mae slashed the price for its initial public offering from roughly $10 a share to $6 a share.
The firm originally planned to sell shares for an amount in the range of $9 to $11 per share. Ellie Mae is offering 5 million shares, while key shareholders have put 2.5 million shares up for sale.
Prior to amending its registration statement, the Pleasanton, Calif.-based firm, which hosts one of the largest electronic mortgage origination networks, said it expected net proceeds to be around $40 million, based on the old offering price of $10 per share.
With the updated price listing of $6 per share, Ellie Mae expects to produce approximately $21.4 million in net proceeds.
Ellie Mae intends to list its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange Amex under the symbol ELLI.
Write to Kerri Panchuk.
Tags: Ellie Mae, New York Stock Exchange
Posted in Origination/Lending, Top Stories | 2 Comments »
Goldman Sachs (GS: 109.82 +1.16%) stock fell more than 2% Thursday morning after Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) suggested a new Senate report might show the investment bank misled Congress when previously testifying about the causes of the financial crisis.
Sen. Levin, who released the bipartisan "Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse" study on Wednesday, told reporters Goldman may have mislead Congress when representatives from the agency testified they were not involved in a short. Levin alleged "their testimony was misleading and inaccurate," but said his office will refer the testimony to the Department of Justice for them to decide whether an act of perjury occurred in front of Congress or not.
Goldman responded to the accusations: "The testimony we have was truthful and accurate and this is confirmed by the Subcommittee's own report. The report references testimony from Goldman Sachs witnesses who repeatedly and consistently acknowledged that we were intermittently net short during 2007. We did not have a massive net short position because our short positions were largely offset by our long positions, and our financial results clearly demonstrate this point."
After Levin's diatribe, Goldman's stock fell, compounding the firm's stress from the impact of the Senate subcommittee's report.
The report released Wednesday also criticized Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank for conflicts of interest and suggested that "throughout 2007, Goldman sold RMBS and CDO securities to its clients without disclosing its own net short positions against the subprime market or its purchase of CDS contracts to gain from the loss in value of some of the very securities it was selling to its clients."
Goldman Sachs took issue with the basic premise of the report.
"While we disagree with much of the report, we take seriously the issues explored by the subcommittee," the company said. "We recently issued the results of a comprehensive examination of our business standards and practices and committed to making significant changes that will strengthen relationships with clients, improve transparency and disclosure and enhance standards for the review, approval and suitability of complex instruments."
The Senate subcommittee report outlines one Goldman deal in which the report claims the firm "selected a large number of poorly performing assets for the CDO, took 40% of the short position, and then marketed the securities to its clients."
The report further claims that "when a client asked how Goldman 'got comfortable' with the New Century loans in the CDO, Goldman personnel tried to dispel concerns about the loans, and did not disclose the firm’s own negative view of them or its short position in the CDO."
The subcommittee report also evaluated Deutsche Bank and reported one alleged incident in which the bank's top global CDO trader "was asked to buy a specific CDO security, and he responded that it rarely trades, but said he 'would take it and try to dupe someone into buying it.'"
Write to Kerri Panchuk.
Tags: CDOs, Deutsche Bank Securities, Goldman Sachs, RMBS, subprime
Posted in Servicing/Default, Slider, Top Stories | 1 Comment »
Improvement in the overall economy and favorable market condition led to increases in both California home sales and median sale price in March, according to the California Association of Realtors.
The organization reported home sales up 3.1% over February and up 1.5% compared to March 2010, to an annualized rate of 514,090 homes. This number represents the number of homes that would sell during 2011 if sales remain on pace with last month.
"For the first time in many months, we are seeing a genuine improvement in the overall economy, especially with respect to jobs," commented Beth Peerce, president of CAR. "However, while interest rates and current home prices are favorable, uncertainty about whether the economy has stabilized, concerns about inflation, and an unresolved state budget have created hesitation among buyers."
San Diego-based DataQuick reported an estimated 36,500 new and resale homes and condos were sold during March, up 33.3% form February. Distressed properties accounted for 57% of homes sold.
As home sales are increasing, unsold inventory is diminishing. In March, the backlog of unsold homes dropped to 5.3 months from 7.3 months in February. One year ago, housing inventory accounted for a 4.8-month supply.
The supply of single-family residencies on the market increased 1.5% in March compared to one year prior, while condo and town home inventory dropped 1.2% compared to the same time period.
The median number of days it took to sell a single-family home was 56.7 days in March 2011, compared with 37 days for the same period a year ago, CAR said.
The median sale price increased 5.4% on a monthly basis to $286,010, according to CAR. Although the firm reported this price is 4.9% below the median price in March 2010, CAR said the data are no cause for concern, as 2010 statistics were inflated by the federal homebuyer tax-credit.
"As for market activity, the pace of sales for the first three months of this year is in line with our expectations for all of 2011," said Leslie Appleton-Young, vice president and chief economist at CAR.
DataQuick reported the median sale price at $249,000 for March.
The median sale price for a single-family home in the Los Angeles metropolitan area was $272,600 in March and in the San Francisco Bay area the median price was $487,060. Those are down 2.7% and 2.4%, respectively, from March 2010.
Write to Christine Ricciardi.
Follow her on Twitter @HWnewbieCR.
Tags: California Association of Realtors
Posted in Origination/Lending, Top Stories | 3 Comments »
A bipartisan study on the financial crisis from a Senate subcommittee mirrors the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission's report in that it blames credit ratings agencies for unleashing the market madness that consumed investors three years ago.
The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released findings from a two-year study this week, saying "inaccurate triple-A credit ratings" from Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Service introduced risk into the financial system and "constituted a key cause of the financial crisis."
The report went a step further alleging that massive downgrades made by the credit ratings agencies a few months before the financial meltdown "precipitated the collapse of the residential mortgage backed-securities and CDO secondary markets" since the changes were "unprecedented in number and scope." The report added that "more than any other single event (the downgrades) triggered the beginning of the financial crisis."
S&P responded to the report Thursday, saying, "As we have said many times, we have been disappointed by the performance of our ratings on certain mortgage-related securities. The actions we took to downgrade U.S. RMBS and CDOs in 2007 and 2008 reflected the unprecedented deterioration in credit quality, but were not a cause of it. We regret that, like many others, we did not foresee the speed and extent of the housing downturn."
The report mirrors the FCIC which concluded that "failures of credit rating agencies were essential cogs in the wheel of financial destruction" and accused the agencies of being enablers. Industry executives also testified before the FCIC on ratings agency failures.
The Senate report says Moody's and S&P knew as early as 2006 that high-risk mortgages were incurring a great deal of delinquencies and default, but the agencies continued to issue "investment grade ratings" on RMBS and CDO securities tied to risky mortgages for the next six months.
When the firms were finally forced in the summer of 2007 to downgrade the RMBS and CDO ratings, investors sold their securities in mass. But, the report says RMBS and CDO securities held by financial firms lost their value with investors unwilling to invest in new securitizations.
The subcommittee also asserted that Moody's and S&P were too close for comfort to Wall Street firms that sought their ratings on mortgage-related products.
Because the ratings firms have an "issuer pays" model, the ratings agencies were dependent on Wall Street firms to bring them new business, the research study concludes.
Write to Kerri Panchuk.
Tags: credit ratings agencies, FCIC, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Moody's Investors Service, S&P, Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Standard & Poor's
Posted in Secondary Market/Investors, Top Stories | 11 Comments »
The shadow inventory in the state of New York — properties with mortgage borrowers more than 90 days delinquent — will take around 154 months to clear.
That's nearly 13 years of unsold property supply.
In the case of shadow inventory, a meaningfully strong housing market will not grow to vibrancy unless homes where the borrower is not likely to amortize are resold.
The number of such homes in New York greatly outweighs the national average of 49 months, according to a Standard & Poor's research note released this week.
S&P says the Empire State is slow to expedite liquidations. New York is one of 21 judicial states, where courts hear foreclosure cases, which means it should take longer than usual. However, a foreclosure mediation program from 2008 is also partially to blame, though the analysts says this still isn't enough to explain the statewide phenomenon.
Other judicial states with foreclosure mediation programs are not nearly as slow to liquidate, the report adds (see chart below).
"The state's extensive mediation program has made the foreclosure process more burdensome than those in most other states," the report states.
Oddly, some unique characteristics to New York are keeping the whopping 154 months lower than the timeline could be. S&P adds that co-ops, for example, can foreclose much quicker as such properties do not require the courts.
Yet from an analytical perceptive none of this explains why New York's shadow inventory liquidation will likely last longer than a decade.
It's true there are more subprime nonagency loans and higher property prices, when compared to national averages.
But still, they conclude, "Despite the idiosyncrasies of the New York housing market, there is no clear reason for the very low liquidation rate in the state."
"Nevertheless, the breadth and strictness of New York's foreclosure mediation procedures are significant contributors to the delays in liquidation."
Follow him on Twitter @JacobGaffney.
Tags: New York, shadow inventory, Standard & Poor's
Posted in Servicing/Default, Top Stories | 6 Comments »
The budget compromise between Democrats and Republicans last week eliminated $88 million in funding for nonprofit counseling groups approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Several of the counseling groups sent a letter this week to members of the House and Senate, urging lawmakers to restore the money. They include the National Urban League, the National Neighborworks Association, the National Community Reinvestment Coalition among others.
"Not only does this program provide financial support, it sets the organizational standards for delivering quality services," the groups said. "Further, these cuts will have a devastating impact on the families that rely on these programs for support."
The program cuts include those for first-time homebuyer counseling and reverse mortgage counseling for senior homeowners. Other programs include counseling for people transitioning out of homeownership through foreclosure and into rentals and counseling for delinquent borrowers.
A HUD spokesperson confirmed the "painful" cuts but could not comment further.
"This is the primary funding for homebuyer counseling, post-purchase non-delinquency counseling (such as refinance and home repair loans), and reverse mortgage counseling," said Bruce Dorpalen, a spokesman for Affordable Housing Centers of America. "In fact, Congress mandated that reverse mortgage counseling is a requirement for receiving a reverse mortgage, but the funding is now cut off."
The budget agreement was reached late Friday night. Republicans pushed for an won $78.5 billion in cuts from President Obama's budget.
The agreement, however, only funds the government through September, when the 2012 budget goes to a vote. Both Obama and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), chairman of the House Budget Committee, introduced plans.
"The American people understand we can’t continue spending money we don’t have, especially when doing so is making it harder to create jobs and get our economy back on track," said House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) this week.
In addition to the cuts to HUD counseling programs, however, the National Association of Home Builders said Thursday if deficit cuts are not done carefully, the struggling housing market will only continue to be harmed.
Write to Jon Prior.
Follow him on Twitter @JonAPrior.
Tags: Boehner, budget, counseling, Democrats, HUD, obama, Republicans
Posted in Servicing/Default, Top Stories | 11 Comments »












