RSS Twitter

Archive for February, 2010

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

One year after its inception, the Obama administration's $75 billion housing help program has failed, Republican lawmakers said Thursday in a new report obtained by ABC News.

The report, released by two GOP lawmakers on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, asserts that the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) is harming the country's economic recovery.

"By every empirical measure, HAMP has failed," concluded Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio., citing a record number of homeowners in foreclosure.

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Gagan Sharma is president and CEO of BSI Financial, an outsourcing provider specializing in mortgage subservicing, default management, loss mitigation, due diligence, REO and quality control services to over 240 lenders and investors. Sharma sat down for this episode of In This Corner to discuss whether the 116,000 permanent HAMP modifications is a recovery mirage or a viable solution.

HAMP (Home Affordable Modification Program) has been in effect nearly a year. Why have so few distressed mortgages been modified so far?

Remember you have as many as seven million mortgages eligible to be modified. That is the total number of potential loans in the delinquency bucket. That number is far more than the number that can really be modified. I heard a senior Treasury Department official say recently that modifications are only for a certain subset of distressed homeowners and we agree. That number is probably around 1.5 million. So far 600,000 to 800,000 trial modifications have been done. I don’t think you’ll see 1.5 million modifications done under HAMP and the re-default rate on those will be significant for two main reasons. One, there are so many people with negative equity and the other is the weak job market. If the borrower couldn’t afford the payment before and you reduce it by 10%, they’re not likely to afford that either. There’s no point in putting people in a modification if they simply can’t afford it.

The basic question is: What is the true affordability of the mortgage given the person’s income and the size of the mortgage? Many loans are simply too far gone to help the borrowers. Modification is one of the tools in the toolbox, but it is not the answer for every situation.

Is modification the only or even preferred way to help borrowers? Under what circumstances will owners of the mortgages be willing to forgive some level of the principal balance?

A lot of it depends on who owns the mortgage. The reason you see many private investors unwilling to participate in HAMP is due to the mandatory interest rate reductions and ceilings. A rate of 2% is not an attractive investment for most. If, however, they bought the loan at 40-to-50 cents on the dollar, they are likely to be more willing to reduce the principal balance.

For their part, banks are happier with HAMP because reducing the interest rate is more acceptable to them. Between savings and checking accounts and borrowing at the federal rate, their cost of funds is close to zero, so even if they reduced the interest rate on the mortgage to 2% they can still earn a positive spread. For them, reduction of the interest rate to reduce the monthly payment has a higher success rate. For example, we’ve heard Wells Fargo has had some success with its option ARMs. But the banks are less willing to reduce the principal balance. If they did, they would have to recognize the loss immediately, and many of them don’t want to do that.

There also has to be a happy medium between the borrower and the lender. You have to give the borrower an incentive to keep paying, but is that fair to the bank or investor? And does that create a moral hazard for borrowers who are current on their loans not to pay?

Is the new Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives a desirable alternative?

Yes, the new HAFA alternatives to foreclosures – short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure – are the way to go. There’s a difference between keeping the borrower in the home and preventing foreclosure. You need to incent the borrower to keep up the property. Let them live in the house and maintain the property for six months and then they can choose to leave with a clean credit record. There is no foreclosure risk that way. Short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure also move the process along faster. The property goes on the market sooner and is in better condition than if it had been abandoned by the homeowner, which means better prices for the house once it goes back on the market.  It’s a win-win for everybody.

How long will it take before mortgage foreclosures start to recede and the market returns to some level of normalcy?

There is a “shadow inventory” of 5-to-7m homes on the market.  It will take a while to flush all of those homes through the system. The best case scenario is one-to-three years, but probably more than one year.

What differentiates servicers in this environment?

The big servicers operate in silos. They have a department for servicing current loans, one for handling modifications, one for foreclosures, etc. The borrower doesn’t know who he’s speaking to when he calls and gets transferred around from one department to another. Smaller servicers focused on this challenge can offer a single point-of-contact, and the borrower knows who he’s dealing with. That gives the borrower a comfort level the big servicers can’t offer. This is crucial in today’s environment because servicing must be done in a cooperative manner. From the servicer’s perspective, the borrower who wants to communicate is worth a lot. If the borrower is actively engaged in dialogue with the servicer, there is a way to turn that conversation into something productive rather than simply moving straight to foreclosure, which nobody wants.  The investors we work with want to work quickly, and we have had a lot of success doing that. They can respond to a short sale request in as little as 24 hours. A big servicer might take four to six weeks to respond to such a request.

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

The delinquent unpaid balance for commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) in January increased 326% from a year ago to $45.9bn, according to the research firm Realpoint. Despite the flagging performance, and general uncertainties in the market, Bank of America (BAC: 7.29 -0.14%)/Merrill Lynch reports that spreads are showing signs of leveling out.

Realpoint reviewed more than $797bn in CMBS pools for the January report. The firm calculated a 5.76% delinquency rate for the pools reviewed, up from 5.22% in December. The rate jumped by more than four times the rate in January 2009, when 1.2% of the reviewed loans fell delinquent. June 2007 held the lowest delinquency rate recorded by Realpoint, at 0.2%.

After analyzing the trends, Realpoint researchers predict a 6-to-7% delinquency rate through Q110 and could pass 9% in the middle of the year.

Foreclosed, repossessed and commercial loans delinquent by 90 or more days increased for the 25th straight month in January – up 28% from the month before and 508% from a year ago.

Default risk grows from older CMBS transactions as borrowers became unable to pay off the loans as scheduled. Most collateral properties that usually generate cash flow were not able to refinance the balloon payment at maturity as credit dried up, according to the report.

“Declined commercial real estate values and diminished equity in collateral properties may prompt more struggling borrowers with marginal collateral performance to walk away from properties,” researchers wrote.

A report from Bank of America Merrill Lynch showed CMBS spreads stabilizing to modestly tighter levels for triple-A paper, during the past week as anxieties eased on large-scale credit issues such as the ability of Greece to pay back its debt:

A Moody’s report showed a 4.1% rise in commercial real estate (CRE) prices through December. But Moody’s analysts said it’s uncertain whether CRE prices reached the bottom or just evidence of the “volatility of a market in transition.”

While the commercial market searches for answers in the dark, analytics firms could be benefitting more than ever with their answers, just as foreclosure data providers such as RealtyTrac and ForeclosureRadar gained market share through the current credit crisis. Recently, the CMBS researcher Trepp purchased Foresight Analytics for an undisclosed amount.

Write to Jon Prior.

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) is working on a proposal to help unemployed borrowers, Josh Denney, the MBA's associate vice president of public policy and government affairs said yesterday.

Speaking at the MBA’s servicing conference, currently going on in San Diego, Denney noted that some 14.8m unemployed Americans, combined with MBA’s findings of 5m loans either 90+ days delinquent or in foreclosure. This factor necessitates a move to “weave a forbearance plan into HAMP,” he said.

MBA president and CEO John Courson, in a letter to Treasury secretary Tim Geithner dated Feb. 18, proposed such a plan.

“There is no doubt that unemployment is a serious challenge for many Americans right now, many of whom are mortgage borrowers,” Courson said. “However, unemployment is usually a temporary condition where the worker is actively searching for a job and willing to work. This is why MBA proposes a forbearance program for unemployed owner-occupant borrowers, whether they are current or delinquent, who have involuntarily lost their employment.”

The program would give incentives to investors and servicers (through Treasury’s TARP) that place unemployed borrowers in a forbearance plan for up to 90 days — a period that can be renewed twice based on borrower’s financial circumstances. This plan would put a borrower in forbearance for up to nine months, at which time (or earlier, at re-employment status) eligibility for a HAMP trial can be determined.

The forbearance is based on the borrower’s ability to make payments at 31% of household income. But if 31% borrower’s household income falls below a $300 threshold, servicers can postpone mortgage payments until the second forbearance phase.

Write to Diana Golobay.

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

The average interest rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) increased this week, according to the results of two rate surveys.

Freddie Mac (FRE: 0.00 N/A) said the average rate for a 30-year FRM increased 12bps to 5.05% with a 0.7 origination point. Last week, the average was 4.93% and a year ago, the rate was 5.07%. Bankrate.com’s survey of large banks and thrifts put the 30-year FRM at 5.15% with a 0.44 origination point, up 4bps from 5.11% last week.

“Interest rates for 30-year fixed mortgages followed long-term bond yields higher and rose above 5% this week amid a mixed set of economic data reports,” said Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist Frank Nothaft.  “For instance, the January producer price index jumped well above the market consensus, but the consumer price index remained subdued and consumer confidence declined to the lowest level since April 2009, according to the Conference Board.”

Freddie said the 15-year FRM average rate was 4.4% with a 0.7 point, up from last week’s average of 4.33%, but below last year’s average of 4.68%. Bankrate.com put the same product at 4.52% with a 0.45 point.

The five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) averaged 4.16% with a 0.6 point, down from last week’s average of 4.23%. A year ago, Freddie said the five-year ARM averaged 4.81%. Bankrate.com put the average rate for a five-year ARM at 4.53% with a 0.45 point, up from 4.51% last week. Freddie said the one-year ARM average rate was 4.15% with a 0.6 point, down from last week’s average of 4.23% and last year’s average of 4.81%.

“There were also varying reports as to the current state of the housing market. The S&P/Case-Shiller national home price index rose for the third consecutive quarter in the fourth quarter, albeit at a slower rate, and the 20-city composite index showed an increase in December 2009 for the seventh month in a row; six metropolitan areas experienced positive year-over-year growth, compared to four in November,” Nothaft said.

New home sales, however, unexpectedly slowed in January to the smallest pace since records began in 1963, and the supply of homes at the current sales rate rose to 9.1 months, the most since May 2009,” he added.

Write to Austin Kilgore.

The author held no relevant investments.

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers (TOL: 22.47 +1.81%) posted a $40.8m, or $0.25 per share, loss for its fiscal year first quarter that ended January 31, 2010.

The results reflect narrowed loss for the builder, in a quarter marked by a 129% increased in the value of its net contracts signed and a more than 30% drop in cancellation rate, compared to the year-ago quarter.

The FY Q110 results include $33.4m in pre-tax write-downs. Toll Brothers said $22.8m of the write-downs was attributable to operating communities, $9m to owned land and $1.6m to land controlled for future communities.

That compares to an $88.9m, or $0.55 per share, loss in FY Q109, when the Pennsylvania-based builder had $156.6m in pre-tax write-downs. Without the write-downs, Toll Brothers said its quarterly loss would have been $23.4m, compared to pre-tax earnings of $100,000 last year.

“A year ago at this time we feared for the stability of the nation's economic system. That worry seems to be behind us,” said chairman and CEO Robert Toll. “The housing market took several years to recover following the downturn of the late 1980's and early 1990's. We expect this recovery to follow a similar pattern.”

Like many other public builders, Toll Brothers benefited from a temporary change in tax law that allowed the company additional time to collect a tax refund from profitable years due to its current losses. The so-called net operating loss (NOL) carryback provision netted Toll Brothers a $16m tax refund attributable to the quarter.

Q110 revenue was $326.7m, down 20% from Q109’s revenue of $409m. Toll Brothers delivered 596 units in the quarter, down 10% from 665 units in the year-ago quarter.

But despite having 26% fewer communities than a year ago, net signed contracts in the quarter totaled 526 units valued at $292.1m, a 98% increase from 266 units and a 129% increase from $127.8m in dollar value, both compared to Q109. The average price per unit of gross contracts signed in Q110 was $555,000, compared to $562,000 in Q409 and $574,000 in Q109. The cancellation rate also dropped from the year-ago quarter to 6.7%, compared to 37.1%.

“This quarter's total net signed contracts were up significantly compared to 2009's first quarter, but last year's results were posted in the midst of the financial crisis,” Toll said. “Our per-community net signed contracts exceeded both 2009's and 2008's first-quarter per-community average; however, our results were approximately half the average of all previous first quarters dating back to 1990.”

Write to Austin Kilgore.

The author held no relevant investments.

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke outlined to Congress a series of policy changes that he said reflect the lessons learned from the financial crisis.

In prepared testimony before the House Financial Services Committee, Bernanke said the Fed supports Congressional efforts at financial reform. The testimony came at the Fed chief’s semiannual testimony on monetary policy.

“The Federal Reserve strongly supports the Congress's ongoing efforts to achieve comprehensive financial reform,” he said. “In the meantime, to strengthen the Federal Reserve's oversight of banking organizations, we have been conducting an intensive self-examination of our regulatory and supervisory responsibilities and have been actively implementing improvements.”

One such change Bernanke supports is publicly naming firms that participated in special lending programs, but added such disclosures should come “after an appropriate delay.”

“It is important that the release occur after a lag that is sufficiently long that investors will not view an institution's use of one of the facilities as a possible indication of ongoing financial problems, thereby undermining market confidence in the institution or discouraging use of any future facility that might become necessary to protect the U.S. economy,” Bernanke said.

He added a lag time would also allow firms adequate time to inform investors through annual reports and other public documents of their use of Federal Reserve facilities. Some have criticized the Fed for not disclosing the names of financial institutions that borrow through the special programs established during the financial crisis, while the central bank has argued disclosures would make the programs less effective because of the potential negative connotation attached to participation.

While noting a number of steps to enhance the Fed’s transparency Bernanke said he would support a Government Accountability Office (GAO) review of the Fed’s management of all facilities created under emergency authorities.

“In particular, we would support legislation authorizing the GAO to audit the operational integrity, collateral policies, use of third-party contractors, accounting, financial reporting, and internal controls of these special credit and liquidity facilities,” Bernanke said.

Bernanke’s seemingly conciliatory tone comes as Congress considers a variety of options for financial reform, including changes that would diminish the Fed’s authority.

The House passed The Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 in December and the Senate is currently considering reform options.

In his overview of the state of the economy, Bernanke said the economy expanded at a annual rate of 4% during the second half of 2009, but noted the job market remains weak. And while many large firms have been able to issue corporate bonds or new equity and do not seem to be hampered by a lack of credit, Bernanke said bank lending continues to contract, reflecting both tightened lending standards and weak demand for credit amid uncertain economic prospects.

Write to Austin Kilgore.

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is negotiating with the US Treasury Department to secure incentive payments to give to the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage servicers that pull off successful modifications made under Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), according to Vance Morris, director office of single-family asset management at HUD.

As the servicing industry continues to work through challenges in terms of implementing adequate technology and necessary staff to handle what many sources here are calling "overwhelming supply," FHA servicers might soon be looking forward to receiving workout incentives through FHA HAMP, similar to those paid out to servicers under the program administered through Treasury, Morris said.

In a session on FHA and Ginnie Mae program updates, Morris noted the difference from previous conferences, when he was "shocked" by how few people attended. He added that HUD is working with the Treasury and is "close" to establishing a mortgagee letter that would establish a payment structure, likely to be administered by the Treasury under HAMP, which is funded through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

Morris also noted HUD is looking to come out with methods to address high re-default rates after modification. HUD is currently developing ways to "reduce the re-default rate but increase the number of people being helped," he said.

The volume of mortgages securitized through Ginnie Mae channels continues to grow, according to Kathleen Gibbons, director of Ginnie's single-family mortgage-backed securities (MBS) division. Most of Ginnies MBS is made up of FHA loans. She noted the monthly volume averaged around $6bn in 2007, but swelled recently and was as high as $46bn last year.

Write to Diana Golobay.

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Bankrupt retail real estate investment trust (REIT) General Growth Properties (GGP: 15.96 +0.19%) will get a $2.63bn infusion in cash from Toronto-based real estate firm Brookfield Asset Management (BAM: 30.40 -0.59%), enabling the shopping mall developer to exit bankruptcy.

The GGP-Brookfield alliance comes just one week after Simon Property Group (SPG: 136.69 +0.12%), a retail REIT and the largest real estate company in the US, announced its unsolicited $10bn offer for GGP. GGP rejected the Simon offer, resulting in a public back-and-forth between the two shopping mall rivals.

The deal with Brookfield will create a new company, General Growth Opportunities (GGO), which will own certain GGP non-core assets, such as all of the company's master planned communities and landmark developments like South Street Seaport and others, Chicago-based GGP said.

In addition, GGP’s unsecured creditors will be paid at par — the debt’s face value — plus accrued interest.

Brookfield will invest $2.5bn in cash in GGP in exchange for GGP common stock, thereby providing sufficient liquidity to fund GGP's bankruptcy emergence needs, GGP said in a release Wednesday afternoon. Under the terms of the plan, GGP shareholders will receive one share of new GGP common stock initially valued at $10 per share, and one share of General Growth Opportunities (GGO) with an initial value of $5 per share. Brookfield will invest $2.5bn at $10 per share for new GGP common stock and up to $125m at $5 per share for GGO common stock.

The deal is not subject to due diligence or financing conditions “and is expected to create a floor value for the purpose of raising additional equity” for GGP. However, the deal must be approved by the bankruptcy court overseeing GGP’s restructuring.

“This proposed plan offers significant value for all of our stakeholders,” said GGP CEO Adam Metz. “It is designed to allow GGP to deliver a minimum of $15 per share in value to our existing common shareholders, while providing our unsecured creditors with par plus accrued interest.”

In consideration for the investment, Brookfield will be granted seven-year warrants to purchase 60m shares of existing GGP common stock at $15 per share. The warrants are intended to provide compensation to Brookfield for its financial commitment, GGP said, adding Brookfield will not receive any other consideration or bid protection, including any break-up fee, expense reimbursement, commitment fee, underwriting discount or any other fees.

“The Brookfield-sponsored recapitalization — coupled with the more than $13bn of restructured debt, our compelling scale as the second-largest regional mall owner, our fortress assets and a business plan that focuses on further deleveraging the balance sheet and building liquidity — provides a strong financial foundation for the future,” Metz added.

Until the court approves the warrants, Pershing Square Capital Management is providing “interim protection” to Brookfield. GGP said if the Brookfield deal doesn’t go through and it completes a transaction with another party at a per share value above $12.75, Pershing Square will be obligated to pay Brookfield 25 percent of its profits from its investment in GGP above $12.75 per share. However, GGP will not be required to reimburse Pershing Square for any amounts paid pursuant to this agreement.

Write to Austin Kilgore.

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Servicers at the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) National Mortgage Servicing Conference, going on this week in San Diego, are looking toward a changing compliance environment as federal modification programs evolve.

The overall sentiment at the conference, despite regulatory challenges and what several participants called "overwhelming inventory," was positive this year.

Rich Rollins, CEO of Infusion Technologies, told HousingWire the general mood is one of excitement, opposed to last year when "everyone's head was down." The significant volume of inventory, rather than bearing negative implications for servicers, now represents opportunity, he said.

"Revitalization is good for the industry," he said.

A key challenge facing the servicing industry, according to Rollins, is the need to get the necessary technology in place to handle this inventory.

Grace Brasington, executive vice president of strategic consulting services at Lender Processing Services (LPS: 16.78 +1.39%), said putting the necessary people and technology in place can get expensive.

The cost to servicers is rising as the incentives of the administration's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) fail to catch up, she said. The incentives that are being provided in HAMP don't equal the cost of technology and resources.

"[HAMP] is not a money-making proposition," Brasington said at a press conference today.

Other participants at the conference echo similar shortfalls present in HAMP.

Steven Horne, president of Wingspan Portfolio Advisors, said there is a "fundamental misalignment of incentives" in federal modification plans.

Gerald Alt, president and CEO of HEART Financial Services noted a "missing component" from most outreach programs, which aim to fix the housing problem without fixing the homeowner's situation. Both un- and under-employment issues continue to pressure borrowers, for example.

"Some people bought too much loan," Alt said.

Another conference participant said HAMP itself did not fail. Instead, the administration promised a solution, when "not everyone deserves a solution."

Brasington noted that "not everybody can be saved," and servicers must sometimes consider "other options" like foreclosure auction, short sales and deeds-in-lieu (DIL) of foreclosure.

Shelley Leonard, senior vice president of consumer lending strategy noted rising delinquency among home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) drives escalating charge-offs.

Home equity lending flew under the radar for a long time, but more attention is being paid now that he performance of these loans affect the banks. There is and increased focus on the way second liens impact modification of first liens, particularly through HAMP.

HAMP for second liens — "2MP" — was released last year and so far only one servicer, Bank of America (BAC: 7.29 -0.14%) signed up, although other banks are voluntarily modifying second liens.

For home equity lenders, the cost of the servicing process is rising. The technology in place does not meet their needs, and they're struggling.

More than 35% of HELOCs are now in a first lien position and can pursue alternatives like short sales and deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure.

"The pool of problem loans continues to grow and mutate," said Ted Jadlos, president and managing director of LPS Applied Analytics.

New problem loans exceed modifications and trials from January 2009 through January 2010, Jadlos found. In January 2010, 2.9 loans deteriorated for every 1 that improved. As of January 2010, 2.9m loans were 90+ days delinquent at an average 272 days delinquent, opposed to a monthly average of 1m loans an average 204 days delinquent in the first half of 2008.

Foreclosure moratoria are not simply "tapping on the brakes" in the foreclosure process — Jadlos said they are as effective as tapping on the brakes on an icy road.

"We do not have a foreclosure problem in this country," he said. "We have a problem of people not paying their bills."

He said between 20 and 50% of HAMP mods will eventually fail. But even putting borrowers in a trial HAMP mod is challenging. There is pressure on servicers that are not processing paperwork, partly due to the fact borrowers do not turn in paperwork.

Write to Diana Golobay.

The author holds no relevant investments



Origination/Lending
Kenneth Bacon, executive vice president of the Fannie Mae multifamily mortgage business, is retiring after 18 years at the mortgage...

Read More »

Servicing/Default
The serious delinquency rate for Federal Housing Administration mortgages reached 9.6% in December, the highest level in more than two...

Read More »