Lend America Mortgage Fraud, 20 Years in the Making?
By: AUSTIN KILGORE
October 26, 2009 6:00 PM CST
The civil lawsuit filed against Lend America parent company Ideal Mortgage Bankers takes aim at 40 Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-backed mortgages the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Justice Department claim were fraudulently approved by the New York-based lender.
But HousingWire’s review of the 155-page suit reveals allegations of a pattern of mortgage fraud that’s spanned more than 20 years across a number of mortgage firms.
The mastermind behind the fraud, HUD and the Justice Dept. claim, is Mike Ashley. Ashley is perhaps best known as a team owner and championship-winning racecar driver in the National Hot Rod Association (NHRA). According to the race team’s Web site, Lend America provides financial support to the racing business through a sponsorship agreement.
The DOJ claims Ashley fostered an environment that encouraged Lend America sales staff to originate FHA loans, even when borrowers were not eligible. In his meetings with sales staff, the suit claims, Ashley told them there were “no minimum credit score requirements” for FHA loans and that it was okay if a borrower made late payments on previous mortgages.
Sales staff could make 10 times the commission on FHA loans than on standard mortgages and almost four times the commission than a subprime mortgage. The suit claims Ashley set a sales goal of one loan origination per week and told loan officers “loans should not be closed in two weeks or a month, but in eight hours.”
In addition, Ashley told sales staff those who did not originate large numbers of FHA-insured mortgages would be terminated from employment at Lend America and that he would fire the lower producing members of his sales staff.
The suit further claims Ashley’s employment agreement required he be paid equivalent to one-half of a percentage point of the principal of every mortgage Lend America originated. Lend America originated nearly $1.1bn in loans in the financial year ending September 30, 2008. Accordingly, Ashley was entitled to nearly $5.4m in compensation during the year. In the suit, Justice claims this arrangement is a violation of HUD regulations.
The sales environment at Lend America resulted in the origination of at least 40 FHA loans that included various fraudulent documentation, the suit claims. The fraudulent documents range from verification of income and employment documents with incorrect information, to in one case, a hand written note, represented to FHA to be from a borrower’s parents indicating the parents would be moving in with the borrower and contributing to the mortgage payment, when in fact, the borrower told Lend America that arrangement would not happen.
The suit claims Lend America also created a slush fund of cash to fund delinquent mortgages for borrowers to conceal their inability to keep up with payments during the first two years of the loan, the period of time that HUD monitors its Direct Endorsers’ delinquency and default rates.
According to the Justice Department lawsuit, Ashley’s worked in a number of positions at mortgage firms, and by his own admission, committed his first act of mortgage fraud in 1989.
According to legal documents filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York against Ideal Mortgage and Ashley, in 1984, Ashley began working for Liberty Mortgage Banking, which was owned by his father, Kenneth Ashley. After working six to eight months at Liberty Mortgage, the younger Ashley left Liberty Mortgage to work for Chase Capital, doing business as Shares Capital Company, a mortgage brokerage set up by his father and others. While Ashley owned a portion of Shares Capital, his father controlled it, Justice said.
As president of Shares Capital, Ashley primarily brokered government-backed mortgages to Liberty Mortgage. Ashley “basically falsif[ied] documentation on mortgages” so that they would meet guidelines for the secondary market, Fannie Mae (FNM: 1.02 -0.97%), Freddie Mac (FRE: 1.14 -1.72%) and other secondary market investors, he would later admit, primarily by fraudulently increasing non-qualifying borrower’s income with false verification of income statements.
In 1991, Liberty and Ashley surrendered their New York mortgage licenses and Liberty gave up its status as a HUD-approved lender. In 1993, Ashley plead guilty to three counts of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with multiple instances of mortgage fraud. In 1996, he was sentenced to five years probation, including two months home confinement and was ordered to pay restitution to Freddie Mac. In 1994, Liberty was found guilty of two counts of wire fraud in a jury trial and in the same year, was sentenced to a $1m fine.
Around 1991, Ashley began work at another firm, Consumer Home Mortgage. After his conviction, Consumer Home Mortgage terminated Ashley’s employment. He then filed a lawsuit against the New York State Banking Department and in a settlement of that suit, paid $30,000 to the Freddie Mac Fraud Unit and $6,300 to two complainants, as well as agreed to not work in the mortgage industry until August 1997. After that time he could return, but until January 1999, he could not hold a managerial or processing position, nor be a principal of a mortgage firm until January 2000. He also appealed his suspension and disbarment as a participant, principal or contractor with HUD, which was later reduced to a ban expiring in May 1998.
In light of the ban, the Justice Department says Ashley formed a marketing firm, Diversified Marketing, and continued to perform marketing for Consumer Home Mortgage’s in a “consultant” capacity, including “training for loan officers and real estate offices including the development of seminars and marketing plans.”
The DOJ claims Ashley rejoined Consumer Home Mortgage in 1997, serving in a variety of roles including sales manager, vice president of marketing, president and chief financial officer.
Despite his background and history of fraudulent behavior, and his temporary industry ban, Ashley continued to find work in the mortgage world. According to the lawsuit, from 1996 to 2001, Ashley increased loan volume 525% from $80m in loans to $500m loans during his second stint at Consumer Home Mortgage.
Ashley’s next career move was to US Mortgage, the company that began the Lend America business unit. The suit claims Ashley brought approximately 40 to 50 of Consumer’s employees with him to US Mortgage to start up the Lend America lending unit.
Consumer Home Mortgage’s president, Robert Standfast, said in an DOJ interview that after Ashley left Consumer, business plummeted. US Mortgage eventually acquired Consumer Home Mortgage.
Ashley worked as an executive vice president at US Mortgage, but left the company on November 9, 2002, as part of a “mutual termination.”
Less than a year later, HUD issued US Mortgage a notice of violation, the result of a quality assurance review that revealed found numerous instances of fraud, including falsified documents, improperly documented funds, improperly documented income, insufficient credit analysis, excessive ratios and insufficient compensating factors.
US Mortgage claimed the violations resulted from Ashley’s work with the Lend America unit, which had since been terminated.
After leaving US Mortgage, Ashley re-opened the Lend America brand, this time under current owner Ideal Mortgage. The Justice Department claims Lend America and Ashley fraudulently concealed Ashley’s employment and criminal history from state regulators. It is during this time that Justice and HUD make their latest claims against Ashley.
After the suit was filed last week, a judge denied the Justice Department’s request for a temporary restraining order to prevent Ideal Mortgage from originating FHA insured loans.
A Lend America spokesperson declined comment for this story.
Write to Austin Kilgore.
-
October 27th, 2009 8:48 am by Hilda E. Davis
Sounds like this fellow took instructions from William R. Runnels “Landbank Equity Corp”, who ultimately served time in federal prison for his mortgage scam. He ultimately filed a 64m dollar Bankruptcy in 9-85, but after being released, began another scam. Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac knew what he was doing but kept buying the loans even after I sent them evidence of the fraudulent loans. It took me two years to get him put under and out of business. The Va. Atty Gen. nor the FBI could comprehend what I was telling them, but the Editor & 2 reporters did. I ultimately went back to Va. and worked with the Trustee and his 2 attorneys in the case as they had no idea what they were dealing with. I again returned to Va. and worked with the Bank/Mtg Co that took over the servicing of loans in 32 states, setting up their depts. and computer programs to service the loans…64 million was a lot of money in 85, but nothing compared to what is happening in todays world. In time, you and others will learn that many Middle Eastern’s will be involved in the mortgage fraud taking place all over the U.S…it may break in the Charlotte, NC area…just my thoughts, and you can bet it will be a little harder to figure out, as they often change a letter in their name and often do it so many times they can’t remember what they used. They will buy a house, sell it to a cell or family member, immediately turn it over to another member, new loan, much larger amount, and do this over and over, each time increasing the loan amount. My fear is a large part of the proceeds are going to terrorist organizations, i.e., Hezbollah…think about it, this is a lot easier than smuggling cigarettes, and more profitable..you’ll also find many that will be found involved are illegals in our country..just remember this, as it will be uncovered, and it won’t be to far in the future..
-
October 27th, 2009 1:46 pm by Mortgage News October 27, 2009 « Mortgage News Wire
[...] Lend America Mortgage Fraud, 20 Years in the Making? – HousingWire [...]
-
October 28th, 2009 7:29 am by Former Employee
Most of that article rang true. Some of it was a bit dated when referencing the current lending practices at Lendamerica. What concerns me most as a former employee is i now wonder what was being manipulated on the loans that i originated. Some of the repeated complaints include VOE fraud, which the loan officer has very little to do with. This was handled by processers and the Underwriter charged with the file. I believe another often abused tactic was abuse of Letters of explanation(LOE’s) for derogatory credit including mortgage lates. I recall being told quite often that the LOE should not be written by the borrower at all and quite often the processor would fabricate an explanation that would meet HUD/FHA requirements.
My tenure was relatively short, about 1 year from 2008-2009 so i missed many of the most grievous violations of years past. In addition to the above transgressions i recall a few other violations. State licensing requirements for individual loan officers was completely ignored. If a loan officer was not licensed in the state for the loan he was attempting to originate then it would be placed in another loan officers name under false pretenses, often paying this loan officer .125 or .25 of a point of the loan. This practice was due to the system in place that supplied the mortgage leads. The phones would ring indiscrimanately with customers from all over the Country. There was no filter to separate unlicensed loan officers from specific states.
The pay/commission structure was very questionable during my tenure. There was clearly an unethical attenpt to drive all borrowers into FHA loans as opposed to a more traditional Conventional product. This was achieved in a devious way. The commission for an FHA loan was 1.00 point of the principle loan amount. In addition there would be up to .5 points paid in bonus for all FHA loans exceeding a certain volume. Now this is where it gets devious and shows an obvious attempt to push even the well qualified borrower into the FHA product. The commission for a conventional loan was .5 points of the principle loan amount. There was NO bonus afforded Conventional loans as was the case for their FHA counterpart. This was an obvious ploy to tempt and drive the loan officer to sell FHA over conventional by manipulating the pay structure and playing on the human element. It hints at the culture of the company. I recall being told directly to sell an FHA loan over conventional many times.
Some lesser violations but serious none the less was privacy violations. The paper shredder was often not used for disposal of personal borrower information.
In addition when asked who the President of our Company was we were told to never mention Mike Ashely as his stated position was Business strategist. This was false. He called all of the shots.
Yet another major violation that i recall was in early 2009 when Lendamerica lost its ability to originate in New York, its home state. The company handled this by having us put the loan in the name of a loan officer, which was houswed in the building behind our own hence having a different address and i would imagine a different license. The loan officer charged with the NY loan was paid directly by Lendamerica for assuming the risk. I am unsure of the specific amount. I must say this just felt wrong at the time. It played a huge role in my exit from the company.
I am sure there was more fraud that took place but i was not subject to it as i did not associate with the more tenured employees. We heard rumours but nothing more i could substantiate.
I hope my post doesnt cause an explosion.
-
October 28th, 2009 12:24 pm by Jim Johnson
It seems you didn’t do you homework. I wondered why the DOJ couldn’t get an injunction. Seems 40 bad loans out of 13,000 isn’t so bad after all. There was a lot more to this than what you put into your article. HUD is using you and the rest of the MSM to trial by press release. And you fell for it.
-
October 28th, 2009 7:25 pm by non
there are 3 sides to every story….
-
October 31st, 2009 1:54 pm by ken ashley
What ever happened to the country of second chances, fair dealing and more importantly due process?Shame on the FHA and the justice department for shooting first and asking questions later and issuing a press release accusing the company of “gaming the System”Their request was denied by a federal judge..because here are the real facts ..1) 40 loans out of 12000 were granted to borrowers who submitted false information.. this is low compared to industry experience 2) While others who received TARP monies cut back on their lending, Lend America was the first to abandon Sub-Prime and reccomend safe fixed rate Government FHA financing to their clents.. Lend America secuitizes all of its FHA product and services for GNMA ..it’s deliquency record on its GNMA portfolio is below any of the TARP receipents 4) Lend america has instituted a paperless system with all incomes verified with the Federal Government.4) Lend America has 600 hard working employees dedicated to originating quality product. 5) the government knows that Michael Ashley has agreements with the New york State Banking Department and HUD to be in the buiness in an executive position.. but chooses to ignore all this facts in order to use the media to drive a good company out of buiness and have the vultures feed on its carcass
Get your HW Fix
Join nearly 10,000 bold subscribers who already get our daily email delivered to their inbox -- it's free, and a great way to ensure you don't miss something.
Events
2009 Dec 09 -- 2009 Dec 10
RMBS: Assessing Value and Risk
This two-day course in New York City will equip market participants with the knowledge and skills to evaluate prime, Alt-A and subprime RMBS portfolios in order to assess their value and understand inherent risks. For more information, visit www.fitchratings.com.
2010 Jan 13 -- 2010 Jan 14
2010 Collection Technology Summit
The Collection Technology Summit is the first industry event to focus solely on collections and its associated technologies and continues to draw top executives from the nation's most prominent institutions. The Collection Technology Summit, where innovation happens. For more information, visit www.collectiontechnology.net



Print This Article








Got something to say?
Remarks by first-time commenters will not appear immediately, and must be approved before they will appear. All comments are subject to HousingWire's usage policy.