Origination/Lending
Cold Feet: Lone Star Looks to Call Off Accredited Deal
By PAUL JACKSON
August 10, 2007 8:51 PM CST
Looks like the real reason for Accredited’s bludgeoning in after-hours trading wasn’t just the company’s regulatory filing forecasting huge net losses for the second quarter of 2007.
It was the fact that Lone Star — slated to purchase Accredited for $400 million — filed a statement with the SEC late Friday disclosing that it no longer intends to complete a purchase of the troubled subprime lender. Lone Star’s filing with regulators said that Accredited would fail to satisfy agreed-upon conditions of closing the deal.
Not suprisingly, Accredited is fighting back as if the company’s life depended upon it. From a press release issued tonight:
Accredited noted that the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Lone Star expressly provides that changes generally affecting the non-prime industry in which the Company operates which have not disproportionately affected the Company do not provide a basis for Lone Star to not honor its obligations. Accredited said that it intends to hold Lone Star to its obligations, and to hold it fully responsible for any damages caused by its failure to satisfy those obligations.
Accredited had said earlier today that it had obtained all required regulatory approvals pursuant to the terms of the proposed acquisition.
Numerous industry sources have shared their opinion with me on this, and one thing is amply clear: more than one person would question Accredited’s future should this deal fall through. Although given the current market dynamics, such speculation feels to me like par for the course across the entire subprime industry more than anything else.
Update: Paul Muolo’s weekly “What We’re Hearing” column has some prescient insight here:
It’s called the “material adverse change” clause and it’s standard language in most purchase contracts for mortgage banking firms. The meltdown in the subprime and alt-A markets has — obviously — changed the value of mortgage firms that are slated to be sold in the next few months. In other words, firms that agreed to sell a few months ago are no longer worth the negotiated price. But what are they now worth? Good question. Stay tuned…
No doubt Muolo’s planning on following that tidbit up with a suggestion that you subscribe to get the full story in Monday’s NMN print edition …
recent stories by department
Origination/Lending
Secondary Market/Investors
Get your HW Fix
Join nearly 10,000 bold subscribers who already get our daily email delivered to their inbox -- it's free, and a great way to ensure you don't miss something.
Events
2009 Jul 09 -- 2009 Jul 10
USFN Legal Issues in Mortgage Servicing Seminar
Geared towards in-house counsel, designed to discuss current legal issues in the mortgage servicing industry and real estate finance. Closed event in Chicago, Ill.; for more information, visit www.usfn.org.
2009 Oct 04 -- 2009 Oct 05
IMN's 15th Annual ABS East
Hosted at the Foutainebleau Resort Miami Beach in Miami, FL, the theme of this year's event is "Navigating a Path to Recovery" and alludes to decisive actions by the government and industry leaders to set a course that will hopefully lead to a revived and robust US securitization market. For more information, visit www.img.org.
2009 Oct 20 -- 2009 Oct 21
RMBS: Assessing Value and Risk
This two-day course in Washington, DC will equip market participants with the knowledge and skills to evaluate prime, Alt-A and subprime RMBS portfolios in order to assess their value and understand inherent risks. For more information, visit www.fitchratings.com.
Print This Article





